1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sav [38]
2 years ago
6

Formal analysis can be done on paintings, but not on sculptures. a. True b. False

Arts
1 answer:
iren [92.7K]2 years ago
8 0
It is false, that formal analysis can be done on paintings, but not on sculptures. Formal analysis can be done  also on sculptures.Formal analysis specific type of visual description. Simple explained it is what the viewer sees (the aspects of <span><span> color, shape, line, mass, and space).</span> It is an analysis of the forms utilized in the painting, or in the sculpture. </span>

You might be interested in
The lightness or darkness of a color refers to:<br> Intensity<br> Color<br> Contrast<br> Value
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

i think its value <3

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare the architectural complexes of Teotihuacan and Chaco Canyon.
Andrew [12]

Answer:

The answer is me

Explanation:

Because...

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Plsss answer the question in the picture plsss complete it ​
enyata [817]

1. I will choose the house

2. This art is representational

3. It is 3D

I hope this helps! Have a great day/night!

6 0
2 years ago
No files or files hosting and no links please. Please help ASAP
hammer [34]

Answer:

ATP

Explanation:

big brain

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. What strategies did the characters use to avoid the barriers and miscommunication?<br> Bakanaman
madam [21]

Answer:

uhm yeah

Explanation:

Have clarity of thought before speaking out

Before you try and get your point across to others, you should be very clear yourself on what you are hoping to convey.

Arranging your thoughts before verbalising them can help you communicate much more clearly and succinctly.

You're much more likely to stay on point, and your listeners are much less likely to be left bored or confused.

It's a better idea to say something like, "I've got a few ideas here. Let me go through them one at a time. We can treat each one on its own merit."

Then, you can give the first one, discuss it, before giving the next one.

If you're unsure that your point has come across as you intended it to, you can also ask your listeners if the point you've made is clear. Whereas, if you've just given a whole lot of points at once, you're then going to get questions from all over the place.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Imagine that you decide to become an artist but have never been taught the elements or the principles of design. How might this
    9·1 answer
  • Who wanna rate my art work?
    7·2 answers
  • Can a work of art be well done but still not be a great work of art? Explain your answer.
    14·2 answers
  • What are the important or advantages of nation building
    15·1 answer
  • What are the key components of print and broadcast journalism?
    11·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. Which technique applies to smoothing the edges of text or a rendered image? blurring, anti-aliasing,
    13·1 answer
  • 1. What instruments could Johann Pachelbel (Pachelbel canon) play?
    14·2 answers
  • (art appreciation) <br><br> what is the definition of a line?
    11·1 answer
  • In addition to his other contributions to jazz in the 1940s, DIzzy Gillespie was an important innovator in the style known as:
    15·1 answer
  • A ________ is a composition with strict imitation throughout. a. augmentation b. retrograde c. canon d. sequence
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!