Because the majority opinion sets forth an explanation that details the rationale used to formulate the court's decision, and as such becomes part of the body of case law, it provides a valuable reference to be used to predict the outcome of future cases. It also reveals which points of law were most prevalent and the manner in which they were analyzed so that the written law is better able to be interpreted.
Well, this is not true, but the opposite is also not true.
<span>Structural linguists look for structure in language, so they would look at how words are composed of phonemes and morphemes. They are mostly working on current languages, but that's because they have access to them easily. When they can, they also study how those patterns evolved historically. De Saussure, the founder of Structural Linguistics is for example and important figure in historical linguistics.</span>
Answer:
1. I have never swum in the sea before.
2. It is the most interesting film I have ever seen.
3. She has been learning English for two years.
4. I´m visiting my family next summer.
5. The last time I was in the theatre was two years ago.
Explanation:
To answer this question one must have a good understanding of the present perfect continuous, which is made up of the present perfect of the verb 'to be' (have/has been), and the present participle of the main verb (base+ing).
