1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dem82 [27]
3 years ago
14

In your opinion should rulers be virtuous ?why or why not

History
1 answer:
vladimir2022 [97]3 years ago
5 0
I think rulers should be virtuous because according to Confucius, a good ruler is virtuous, wise, and humane. Thus, to ensure that he is not overthrown, the ruler must always possesses de, or virtue, and lead the country morally.
You might be interested in
Why were the Radical Republicans angry with Lincoln and Johnson
VLD [36.1K]
The Radical Republicans were<span> a faction of American politicians within the Republican Party of ... Andrew </span>Johnson<span> was thought to be a Radical when he became president in 1865, but he soon became their leading opponent. ... </span>Radical Republicans were<span> often critical of </span>Lincoln<span>, who they believed was too slow in freeing ...</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements describes the relationship of William Blake and Thomas Gray to William Wordsworth and Samuel T
yulyashka [42]
The correct answer is C) The first pair were Enlightenment authors with romantic characteristics. The second pair were the first to identify themselves as romantics.

That is why many people consider William Blake to be pre-romanticist due to his high subjectivity and mythical and mystical aspects of his poetry.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This type of government has total control over the people's lives. People have no individual choices.
iren2701 [21]
The answer would be Communism
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Type your response in the box.
Marta_Voda [28]
The Spanish and French explorers both came to the New World in search of wealth. They also came to claim land for their countries and establish colonies in the New World. However, the Spanish forcefully took land and wealth by warring against the Native American tribes who resisted them. On the other hand, the French did not use force and violence. They traded with the Native American tribes, hunted the wildlife, and tried to find a northwest route to Asia.
7 0
2 years ago
How were the ships in the time of ancient greece powered?
Shalnov [3]
Slaves rowing below deck
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • French and Spanish explorers differed most in terms of their
    12·2 answers
  • Why did pioneer families tend to settle in communities along major rivers
    15·1 answer
  • How did Traft continue Roosevelt'sProgressive politicals
    8·1 answer
  • What are 3 thines Hitler did<br>to Jews?​
    15·1 answer
  • The U.S. wanted to remain neutral in World War II because
    13·1 answer
  • One of the major effects the New Deal had on the United States was that it created laws that provided equal economic opportunity
    14·1 answer
  • Name 2 disadvantages to working at home during the industrial revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • To show an increase in demand you would:
    11·1 answer
  • Plz hurry// Consider this thesis statement: “Frederick Douglass contributed to the abolitionist movement by describing his exper
    12·2 answers
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!