1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nady [450]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following best describes how Japan changed from an isolationist society to a world power?

History
2 answers:
Anarel [89]3 years ago
7 0

The statement that best describes how Japan changed from isolationist society to a world power is <em>Japan's industrialization enabled it to build modern warships and weaponry</em>.  After the defeat of the shogunate, the Emperor Mutsuhito, called Meiji, came to power. Japan reacted to outside pressure by changing internal market and fostering industrialization. This brought great changes in society.

Aliun [14]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is:

D. Japan’s industrialization enabled it to build modern warships and weaponry.

This best describes how Japan changed from an isolationist society to a world power.

|Huntrw6|

You might be interested in
Which best describes the public/private partnerships created under roosevelt's new deal reforms?
vovikov84 [41]
If your answer choices are:
<span>A) The government took ownership of large private businesses.
B) The government put management of large companies up for a public vote.
C) The government hired individuals to provide private goods and services.
D) The government hired companies to provide public goods and services.

Then the answer should be <em>"</em><em>D)</em><em> T</em></span><span><em>he government hired companies to provide public goods and services"</em></span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which war decision ultimately damaged the colonial economy?
vodomira [7]
I took a test question like this, do NOT pick selling war bonds.
3 0
4 years ago
Why did Hitler most likely believe Germany had a right to invade other countries?
olya-2409 [2.1K]
Its The concept of nationalism meant keeping all Germans together 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Though they are rare today, the most common form of rule in world history has been : (monarchy/dictatorship)
LuckyWell [14K]

The most common form of rule in world history has been monarchy (from the Greek <em>monos</em>, "one," and <em>arche</em>, "power"). It is an unipersonal, hereditary and lifelong form of government. The Head of State is the king (or queen), the prince or the emperor. Although monarchy was at first absolute (the ruler had absolute or total power), it then evolved into a limited form (the ruler needed the help of the most powerful members of society) and finally into a constitutional form (the ruler is primarily a symbolic figure and the nation is governed by a parliament).

At present, the monarchy is the form of government of a few countries around the world, such as Spain, England, Japan and Denmark, to name a few.    

7 0
3 years ago
Causes de l'entrada de EUA a la guerra del 1898
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

y conocida por cualquier estudiante estadounidense de bachillerato como la Primera Guerra Mundial. Con más de 17 millones de personas muertas en esta guerra, incluyendo a más de 116.000 estadounidenses, y varios millones más heridos, gaseados o mutilados, es un conflicto hoy ampliamente desconocido. De hecho, debido al tamaño y ámbito de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, su influencia cultural y su mayor cobertura y registro en los medios de comunicación, a la Primera Guerra Mundial se la llama a menudo “la guerra olvidada”.

Aun así, fue un acontecimiento catastrófico por sí mismo que al tiempo anunciaba la guerra más intensa y violenta en el siglo XX y alimentaba el crecimiento del pantagruélico gobierno central en Estados Unidos. Sin embargo, lo más importante fue que fue una guerra que nunca debería haberse producido (los orígenes causales y la asignación de culpa siguen siendo temas polémicos de debate un siglo después, un hecho que por sí solo atestigua su superfluidad) y una en la que, en todo caso, Estados Unidos no debería haber entrado jamás. Estas son las perturbadoras tesis acerca de la guerra que no serán recordadas por nadie en las élites globales en París esta semana, pero que, dadas las lecciones para la actualidad, los estadounidenses deberían aprender de ellas, para reclamar a sus dirigentes en Washington políticas más sabias en el futuro. Lo que sigue es un breve resumen de la implicación de Estados Unidos en la guerra y sus lecciones para la actualidad.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!
    7·1 answer
  • what philosopher does the idea of consent of the governed come from and what does the philosopher call that principle?
    12·1 answer
  • Fill in the propositions and their conclusions, which Jefferson says are “self-evident.”
    6·1 answer
  • Use the drop down menus to complete the sentences mansa musa was the ruler of mali he was a devout Muslim and he took a journey
    14·2 answers
  • Which would be good historical evidence when studying Manifest Destiny?
    9·1 answer
  • Considering the Salem Witch Trials and what women were generally accused of, what does this tell us about the influences of soci
    13·2 answers
  • What role did the Bolsheviks play in the Russian Revolution of 1917
    14·2 answers
  • Which two sources are secondary sources for an essay on World War II?
    5·2 answers
  • What does this quote mean?<br><br> "history will be kind to me for i intend to write it"
    13·1 answer
  • What are the 7 periods of the government?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!