The Arch of Constantine is more than just a triumphal monument. It is a symbolic union between Constantine and his past rulers and a harbinger of a new religion. The Arch of Constantine is the greatest surviving Roman triumphal arch.
<h3>What is
Constantine?</h3>
- Constantine I, also known as Constantine the Great, was Roman emperor from 306 to 337 AD and was the first person to convert to Christianity.
- Born in Nisos, Dacia in the Mediterranean, he was born the son of Constantine his Flavius, a Roman army officer of Illyrian origin, who was one of his four rulers of Tetrarchia.
- Constantine made Christianity the main religion of Rome and founded Constantinople, which became the most powerful city in the world.
- Emperor Constantine ruled during a major transitional period of the Roman Empire.
- Constantine I was a Roman emperor who reigned in the early 4th century.
- He was the first Christian emperor and saw the empire begin to become a Christian nation.
- He played an important role in the spread of Christianity by legalizing the practice of Christianity and financially supporting church activities.
- He made one of his greatest contributions to his faith by convening the councils of Arles and Nicaea.
To learn more about Constantine from the given link :
brainly.com/question/2656862
#SPJ4
The reasons for the establishment of the League of Nations can bee seen in the year in which it was established: just after the first World War.
At that time, a big proportion of world was devastated by the effects of the war, and arguably almost the whole world was affected in some way. People seeked peace and wanted to establish means that would prevent a similar war in the future. An international organisation of nations was established with that purpose: to support world peace.
As we know, this aim was not reached, as soon another world-scale war followed. In fact by that time (1939), a lot of nations, including Germany (which in any case joined late, as it was not allowed to join just after they had lost another war) have withdrawn from the League of nations. Additionally, the League was not as powerfull as it would have been if the US had joined: another factor that contributed to its failure.
It would be False. This is because in culture today, there is a much more diverse society in general, and there is a much higher demand for jobs, so people take what they can get.
Idk you didn't really ask us a question