Answer:
The correct answer is:
D. overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling accepting segregated facilities.
Explanation:
<u><em>What is the Brown v. Board of Education case about (1954)?</em></u>
The US Supreme Court decided that racial segregation in schools was unconstitutional (forbidden by the law), because it violated the 14th Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause it contains. Until then, children from racial minorities had to go to schools that were separate from the schools where white children went.
In this context, 13 parents from Topeka, Kansas, sued the Topeka Board of Education for their 20 children who were segregated in schools on racial grounds. The case went up to the Supreme Court and they won.
<u><em>What is the Plessy v. Ferguson case about (1896)?</em></u>
In this case with similar facts, the US Supreme Court had ruled that racial segregation in schools <u>that had equal facilities, accommodations and services was legal </u>(<em>"separate but equal"</em>), a decision which supported racist views and a defeat for the the Civil Rights Movement.
<u>However, Brown v. Board of Education overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling and it paved the way for ending racial segregation and justice for the racial minorities, especially in school. </u>
<u></u>
Answer:
<h2>B. Genocide</h2>
Explanation:
There was a large genocide in Cambodia that killed over 2 million people. The survivors fled to other countries, including the U.S.
<h2>I'm always happy to help :)</h2>
Answer:
causes: the colonists had no representation in parliment
different acts were passed as taxes without the colonists consent
colonists were expected to pay for the french and indian war
the rest are effects :)
Answer:
One drawback of pure competition is that sellers don't have the opportunity to earn more than their competitors unlike in monopolies, the sellers can set their own prices.
Explanation:
Pure competition is a type of situation where sellers offer the same products of the same prices. This is also called<em> "atomistic market."</em> So you can imagine that the different companies have almost the same sale. An example of an item under pure competition is "corn." Vendors (people) usually sell them at the same price and quality. If differences do exist,<em> they're totally irrelevan</em>t.
The argument Oliver Wendell Holmes was making in this quotation about how the federal system works is that:
- "The Supreme Court needs to be able to settle disputes between the states and the federal government by reviewing the constitutionality of state laws."
- This is evident when he said, "I do think the Union would be imperiled if we could not make the declaration as to the laws of several States."
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Oliver Wendell Holmes felt for the federal system to work, the Supreme court should be able to make the distinction between federal and state laws.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17812433
