Answer: It produces inefficient economic results under certain conditions
Explanation: The above situation is known as the paradox of voting,which tries to show that the cost of voting will always be higher than the result obtained from the voting process.This is because Majority voting undermines the importance of an individual voter. This issue was first highlighted in 1793 by Nicolas de Condorcet,where noted that in a single stage election the influence of a single voter reduces as the number of voters increase.
The paradox of voting further highlights that the expected results/outcome of a voter from an electioneering process is less than what the initial expectations.
Answer:
participant bias
Explanation:
tbh i didnt even learn this nor im prob EVER gunna learn this but based on the example i think its participant bias soo yea..hopefully this helps you
Answer:
a) moving from Canada to the United States.
Explanation:
External migration occurs when a person immigrate from one country to another country. Therefore, this is a movement BETWEEN countries.
When we take a look at our options we see that the option involving 2 countries would be:
A) moving from Canada to the United States.
Perhaps the most famous invention that changed the countryside during the industrial revolution was the cotton gin. the cotton gin allowed allowed for seeds to be separated from cotton fibers, a process that was extremely laborious when done by hand.
i’m not sure if this is what you wanted but hope this helps!!
Answer:
magic
Explanation:
lets say a "low income family" goes to store and buys there food for the week. now it doesn't matter if they use cash or debit because the person who owns the store is still get there money.
