The reason why a serious natural disaster such as a flood, famine, or earthquake might lead to migration is that people might need to migrate to rebuild their lives.
<h3>How do natural disasters affect migration?</h3>
When there is a natural disaster such as a flood, famine, or earthquake people tend to lose their belongings as well as their lives.
Those who survived would be unable to rebuild their lives in the places that are still damaged and so will have to migrate to other areas where they can then go about rebuilding and regaining what they lost.
Find out more on the effects of natural disasters at brainly.com/question/13800641
#SPJ1
This information was missing in the question:
Who will prevail?
A. The manufacturer, because the communications between the parties were not definite or certain enough to form a contract.
B. The manufacturer, because it never accepted the offer contained in the store owner's e-mail.
C. The store owner, because his e-mail was an acceptance of the manufacturer's offer.
D. The store owner, because he changed his position in reliance on the manufacturer's promise to deliver the video games within one week.
Answer: B.
Explanation: First we need to take into account that if the communication want to be an offer, it must contain a any kind of promise or commitment that can be include in a contract. The broader communicating media, for example: publications, and the courts will view the communication as a way of solicitation of an offer. An advertisement in a journal is often considered as an invitation to submit offers, but not an offer itself. Furthermore, the store owner's e-mail was an offer that was never accepted by the manufacturer.
Hope this helps.
These policies were based on Clinton's belief and principle, which was also known as the Doctrine of Enlargement. The Doctrine of Enlargement asked for a free competition in global trade and promoting democracy with minimum intervention in foreign political affairs while America to be remaining as the global leader.
Peyton Farquhar was a man who would strive to accomplish anything for the Confederacy. The line “No service was too humble for him to perform in the aid of the South, no adventure too perilous for him to undertake if consistent with the character of a civilian who was at heart a soldier” confirms his devotion toward the Confederacy.
<em>Some this you can do is</em>
- <em>Start the essay off with a Graber for example: Did you know Fedrick Duglous ..."? </em>
- <em>Also in a essay, you have to only include the important key events</em>
<em>For example, some key events are </em>
- <em>Frederick Douglass was born in 1818 and died in 1895.</em>
- <em>He was also a slave.</em>
- <em>He thought that slavery was morally wrong and, therefore, should be banned, while Captain Canot was fine with it and, in fact, supported it.</em>
- <em>Frederick, being a slave helped with the reason he was against it.</em>
- <em>But, there are many other reasons why he thought it was wrong.</em>
- <em>One other reason he thought slavery was wrong was that Frederick saw children's mothers and children being slaves while usually the father would be white and the slave owner, this also brought domestic violence.</em>
- <em>Frederick, also based his views on how he was taught and his education.</em>
- <em>Captain Canot, on the other hand, was born into a white family in 1804 and was always taught owning a slave was not wrong.</em>
- <em>This, is a reason why he believed it was okay to own slaves (seeing a pattern?).</em>
- <em>Captain Canot never experienced what being a slave was and what having no rights at all felt like.</em>
- <em>So of course, having no experience Captain Canot thought slavery wasn't that bad.</em>
- <em>However, Captain Canot and his men also saw African Americans as just "cargo" something just to be delivered and kept alive.</em>
- <em>The idea of African Americans being a lower class than a peasant, or a "sub-human" wasn't made overnight, it was made through hundreds of years of slavery.</em>
- <em>Although Captain Canot was not in slavery his whole life around 1840 he stopped taking slaves and decided to go into the plantation industry in the same region he was in, he still occasionally participated in slave trafficking but was not often.</em>
<em>I really hope that answers your question</em>