Well to write there ideas and scrolls for anctient texts
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>A. The constitution already limited Powers of government, so a list of rights was not needed. </em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The idea behind having a Constitution is that it limits the powers of the government and sets certain law and rules that are to be followed while governing. Hence when there were debates for the "ratification" of the Constitution, the Federalists concluded that the Constitution didn’t require any list of rights, as the Constitution itself limits the powers of the government. Moreover, Bill of Rights was unnecessary as the Constitution was drafted with a strong concept of "Separation of Powers", and the Check and Balance system. Under this the government has been divided into three categories and these three categories check and limit the powers of each other.
Among the following choices given in the question, independence is the one that does not belong to the medieval code of chivalry. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or the third option. I hope that this is the answer you were looking for and it has come to your help.
I think he meant that even though the Constitution is a set of laws we have to follow, individuals have unalienable rights. Also, he could've been talking about moral ideas.
