Answer:
1. m=- -1 2. -1+1
Step-by-step explanation:
Ok for the first one you need to label 3 x1 0 y1 6 x2
and -3 y2
Next you need to do y2-y1 over x2-x1 so fill that in and your equasion is (-3-0)
------------ = -3
( 6-3) ----
3
That reduces to -1 because -3 divided by 3 is -1
As for number 2 we need to find b to do this pick any of the y's from before we can go with 0 so the 0 is y in the equasion and we already learned slope is -1 so your equasion should be 0=--1+b ok to solve this you need to add -1 to both sides since its a negitive so you add 1 to 0 which is 1 and when you add 1 to -1 it cancells it out so you have 1=b so b is 1 for the equsion you just fill it in so it is y=- -1+1
I hope I helped
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Since line e is perpendicular to line d, the slope for line e would be the inverse of line d.
Therefore, the slope of e would have to be .
When lines are perpendicular inverse the slope.
When lines are parallel the slope stays the same but the y-intercept changes.
<em>I hope this helps!!</em>
<em>If you have any questions let me know!</em>
<em>- Kay :)</em>
Answer:
30/52
Step-by-step explanation:
its a 26/52% chance to get a black card because 13 spain cards and 13 clovers add it together you get 26 and theirs 4 kings in a dack so add them both together 26/52+4/52=30/52
<h2>Answer: 30/52</h2>
Answer:
Well.
\ /
<em> 2 solutions </em>
x =(-7-√65)/2=-7.531
<em> x =(-7+√65)/2= 0.531</em>
/ \
Using the quadratic formula..
2.3 Solving x2+7x-4 = 0 by the Quadratic Formula .
According to the Quadratic Formula, x , the solution for Ax2+Bx+C = 0 , where A, B and C are numbers, often called coefficients, is given by :
- B ± √ B2-4AC
x = ————————
2A
In our case, A = 1
B = 7
C = -4
Accordingly, B2 - 4AC =
49 - (-16) =
65
Applying the quadratic formula :
-7 ± √ 65
x = —————
2
√ 65 , rounded to 4 decimal digits, is 8.0623
So now we are looking at:
x = ( -7 ± 8.062 ) / 2
<em> </em><em> \ /</em>
<em> Two real solutions:</em>
<em> x =(-7+√65)/2= 0.531</em>
<em> or:</em>
<em> x =(-7-√65)/2=-7.531</em>
\ /
*eliza*
No they aren’t the measurements don’t add up and they aren’t congruent to be similar
![\sqrt[7]{e4}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5Csqrt%5B7%5D%7Be4%7D%20)
)