1. Holocaust
2. Final Solution
3. Nuremberg Race Laws
4. Josef Stalin
5. Rationing
6. Scrap metal
7. Japanese
8. Before the Holocaust, Germany passed the Nuremberg Race Laws, which stripped Jews of their citizenship. Once deprived of their status as citizens, the Nazis proceeded to relocate Jews into ghettos and target their businesses for destruction, before removing them to concentration camps to perform forced labor. Eventually, the labor camps became extermination camps.
9. The sheer scale of civilian casualties was different from any previous war. Civilians were targeted, and their deaths outnumbered military deaths. Technology like the atomic bomb or airplanes increased the threat to civilians. Similar to WWI, women stepped into occupations and roles that had previously been performed by men. Also, like WWI, WWII was a total war. The mass extermination of Jews, political and religious dissenters, Roma, and other peoples was unprecedented.
10. Based on the scale of civilian deaths, particularly the brutality of the Nazis and Japanese, students might rationalize the dropping of the bombs, agreeing that the conflict needed to be stopped at all costs. On the other hand, students may also perceive the dropping of the atomic bombs as just as ethically problematic since it, too, was a mass killing of civilians. Students may point to the Japanese internment camps as further evidence that the Allies, specifically the United States, acted out of prejudice.
straight from Pf my guy :)
The last one because he conquered the Persians empire.
Hope this helps :)))
Mount Everest is the tallest mountain.
They hoped to get their destroyed land paid and fixed by Germany because of trench warfare during WW1 and to reduce Germany military power <span />
Answer:
D. The right to a lawyer; it allows a defendant to always be able to defend themselves in a criminal case.
Explanation:
The famous Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainright in 1963 was a case regarding a convict Clarence Earl Gideon, who had no legal representation and his pleas to be given a lawyer by the government. The ruling was in favor of Gideon and asked the state to provide a lawyer for the defendant.
According to the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, every citizen has the right to equal protection under the law. And the 6th Amendment also states that criminal defendants have the right to get representation even if they cannot afford one. So, in respect to these two amendments, the<u> Gideon v. Wainright case touched both issues and thus, gave the defendant the right to be represented by a lawyer and also be given the chance to defend himself in any criminal case.</u>
Thus, the correct answer is option D.
