3 years ago

Is 2.12359..... rational???

Mathematics

2 answers:

Lynna [10]3 years ago

8 0

No this number is irrational because it cannot he expressed in fraction form.

den301095 [7]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Rational numbers are those that can be represented in a fraction form.

2.12359.... cannot be represented in a fraction form.

So, it is NOT a rational number

You might be interested in

1 1/10 in its simplest form

torisob [31]

11/10= 1 1/10 hope it helps

3 0

3 years ago

Can you help me with this one?

True [87]

Haven’t done this in a while but the first is rational, second is irrational, third is rational, fourth is irrational, fifth is rational, sixth is rational, seventh is irrational

5 0

3 years ago

Part A: Clancey and Ethan are starting new books. So far, Clancey has read 1/4 of his book, which has 240 total pages and Ethan

Nonamiya [84]

In order to find who has read more pages, let's find the number of pages read by each one.

The number of pages read by Clancey is:

$\frac{1}{4}\cdot240=\frac{240}{4}=60$

The number of pages read by Ethan is:

$\frac{2}{5}\cdot170=\frac{340}{5}=68$

So Ethan read more pages.

The combined number of pages in both books is 240 + 170 = 410.

The combined number of pages read is 60 + 68 = 128

So the fraction is:

$\frac{128}{410}=\frac{64}{205}$

5 0

1 year ago

10 cm 10 cm 30 cm. 14.1 cm

Leokris [45]

answer; you

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Please help! will give brainliest for the best helper! or first to answer aka meaning first to help :)

AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

angle 2 = 37º

Step-by-step explanation:

When two lines intersect they make vertical angles, which are angles directly across from another. Vertical angles are always congruent.

4 0

3 years ago

Is 2.12359..... rational???​

Is 2.12359..... rational???