1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zysi [14]
3 years ago
8

What was the result of the embargo Jefferson declared against Britain in 1807? A.It caused a substantial increase in profits for

American merchants.
B. It allowed American farmers to export goods to foreign markets.
C. It disrupted the British economy and closed British factories.
D. It angered American voters and led to increased Federalist support.
History
2 answers:
cricket20 [7]3 years ago
7 0
B. it allowed American farmers to export goods to foreign markets
wlad13 [49]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Option D, is the right answer.

Explanation:

It angered American voters and led to increased Federalist support.

The Embargo Act of 1807 was a law enacted by the Congress of the United States and signed by the then President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson. This law banned American vessels from selling in all foreign harbors. The law was inflicted in response to infringements of U.S. neutrality, in which American ships and their shipload were seized as the plunder of war by the European armadas. Therefore, this law prevented American ships from moving their harbors until Britain and France consented to stay seizing them at sea. The Federalists and leaders of Connecticut’s ruling party take advantage of the situation by opposing this act of Jefferson and pulling Americans towards Federalists' ideology.

You might be interested in
Which of the following was a roman contribution to art
kirill [66]
<span>A. Marble sculpture 
B.oil painting </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. Scientists at the Ethical Treatment for Animals report findings that show raising livestock is (2 points)
gladu [14]

Answer and Explanation:

You should ask these questions before making a judgment about the findings that raising livestock is harmful to the environment and that the sale of meat should be banned:

<em>1. How many studies have shown the same results?</em>

This is an important question to ask since results from one researcher or (group of researcher) need to be tested for reliability and validity before it is accepted as scientific truth or fact. This is why you should check if other studies also show the same result about the harmful effects of raising livestock on the environment.

<em>2. Does the group conducting the study have anything to gain by interpreting their findings in this way?</em>

Unfortunately, at times, certain researchers or groups of researchers fabricate or exaggerate their research findings for their own gains or to further their agendas.  In this instance, since the group conducting the research is the <em>Ethical Treatment for Animals</em> it is possible that the group interpreted and published the research findings to fit their own paradigm- that eating meat is unethical and should be stopped- when in fact such a claim needs further testing.

<em>3. Does the environmental damage matter as much as people's freedom to eat what they choose?</em>

This is a valid question to consider as it involves the matter of free will. Banning the sale of meat would take away the free will of individuals who would like to continue consuming meat despite evidence suggesting that it is harmful for the environment. Thus, it is important the consider whether environmental damage matters as much as people's freedom to eat what they choose when making a judgement about these research findings.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the states rights do beat of the early and mid-1800s
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Not given any options, but if the choices are:

a.a conflict between the idea of federalism and the US Constitution.

b.a conflict between the ideas of federalism and sectionalism.

c.a conflict between the rights of one state and the rights of another.

d.a conflict between the ideas of sectionalism and nullification


The correct answer is B.) .a conflict between the ideas of federalism and sectionalism.

4 0
4 years ago
In addition to fighting in the army how did European colony contribute to the war effort
Montano1993 [528]
At the start of World War I, European powers held vast colonies in India, Africa, and Asia. Colonies they frequently controlled with military force. Troops were often made up of local soldiers, who were sometimes used to fight against their own countrymen, but rarely against white men, and never in Europe.
I hope I could be of assistance let me know if you need help with anything else
7 0
3 years ago
Answer ASAP and whoever answers correctly can have brainliest
Svetllana [295]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to the Holy Bible, Jesus begins to perform healings. There were many healers during Jesus’ time. What made Jesus’ heal
    13·1 answer
  • Im helping anyone who needs a quick response to their questions
    11·2 answers
  • The colony<br> was<br> growing in size but not<br> making any<br><br> money<br> food<br> medicine
    11·1 answer
  • Members of the Church of England who wanted to purify and simplify the church were called:
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Ethiopia become increasingly isolated from its neighbors over the centuries?
    15·1 answer
  • True or false at the time of the civil war another name for the northerners was yankies
    7·2 answers
  • These events are characteristic of which historical era?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these areas in the colonial era would be likely to have the greatest number of large landowners and indentured servants
    11·1 answer
  • The ancient olympic games began in :
    10·1 answer
  • How did the use of television and photographs from the vietnam war impact the war effort in the united states?.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!