Answer:
The answer is "The second choice".
Explanation:
Claims for the thesis cannot be made or suggested without absolute evidence to substantiate the assertion. This will make what the author claims to have been rendered true.
This same argument of its thesis mentioned all this in the Riddle of a Rosetta Stone, James Cross Giblin "simple descriptions of its important historical figures in Egyptian History throughout The Riddle of its Rosetta Stone." Now to support the thesis statement, he has figured out just how French physicists found out about the three inscriptions it must have described "the son of Thoth". This statement does seem to prove conclusive proof of Giblin's an argument/implicit point regarding the historic events of ancient Greece.
Here's link to the answer:
tinyurl.com/wpazsebu
The question requires a personal answer, about your interpretation of the text. In that case, I can't write your answer, but I'll show you how to do it.
Your question refers to the text "auto-concept" written by Saul McLeod. In this case, the first step to answering this question is to read this text and understand the concepts presented in it.
The text presents the three components of the self-concept and how they are established in an individual's life and his/her perception of himself or herself.
These components were explained by Carl Rogers as self-image, self-esteem, and the ideal self.
<h3>O que os componentes da autoimagem representam?</h3>
- Self-image: The view that the individual has of himself.
- Self-esteem: The value that the individual gives to himself.
- Ideal Self: The way the individual would like to be.
In this case, to answer your questions, you must decide which of these components is more convincing and less convincing for your interpretation of the text.
In addition, you must determine whether Carl Roger's conceptualization of these components is effective.
Learn more about Carl Roger at the link:
brainly.com/question/14018413
Takes up for what he or she person does
