1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murljashka [212]
3 years ago
5

Based on what you've learned in this lesson, do you think a country is better off under communism or under a ruthless or corrupt

leader who holds democratic elections? Support your answer with examples. PLEASE HELP (APUSH 2)
History
2 answers:
vaieri [72.5K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Corrupt leader.

Explanation:

Communism still sucks.

inessss [21]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I'm not exactly sure what you guys learned in your lesson. I feel like it would really depend. In Communism, a revolution is usually encouraged and in this transition period things could get a bit out of control. Think how after Stalin came to power the Great Purge happened. Anyone who was a political opponent of Stalin was killed. Also think of when collective farms were imposed. Kulaks who resisted working on collective farms were killed. Even Lenin considered or at least warned that he would have the kulaks killed if they resisted the change as shown in his 1918 Hanging Order. In a communist society, ideally everyone would be of the same class. Everything would be provided by the government. Their normally wouldn't be much of a variety of things to choose from when going to the store. There would just be the necessities. You'd also have to wait in line for a long time to get those commodities. Those might be a few other things to think about. Of course their are many other things to consider.

I'm not sure what is meant by,"a ruthless or corrupt leader who holds democratic elections. . .". I'm not sure if that means a sort of fascist-like leader who, on certain issues, would hold elections but most of the time would do whatever he wants. I suppose it could also mean a president who is very harsh or holds very extreme views. If it means the latter than I would choose to live their as opposed to an early U.S.S.R. If what is meant is the fascist-like government then probably not. It would probably turn out much like Communist society in which their is a totalitarian government and all opponents are arrested or persecuted.

You might be interested in
How did the british protect their supremancy with the help of military system?
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

The British seemed unbeatable. During the previous 100 years, the British had enjoyed triumph after triumph over nations as powerful as France and Spain. At first glance, the odds were clearly against the Americans. A closer look provides insight into how the underdogs emerged victorious. Britain's military was the best in the world. Their soldiers were well equipped, well disciplined, well paid, and well fed. The British navy dominated the seas. Funds were much more easily raised by the Empire than by the Continental Congress. Some of those funds were used to hire Hessian mercenaries to fight the Americans. The Americans had tremendous difficulty raising enough funds to purchase basic supplies for their troops, including shoes and blankets. The British had a winning tradition. Around one in five Americans openly favored the Crown, with about half of the population hoping to avoid the conflict altogether. Most Indian tribes sided with Britain, who promised protection of tribal lands.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Native groups responded to french colonization of indochina by
velikii [3]

Answer: By protesting French policies and forming resistance organizations or organizing demonstrations against french rule

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
How did East Asia's highlands affect human settlement?
Alla [95]

Answer:

People were forced to live a nomadic lifestyle due to the rocky terrain and deserts. People were unable to remain in the highlands during the winter due to the harsh climate. People were forced to abandon their settlements due to a lack of basic natural resources. Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Who Fought in the French and Indian War? ..
Kryger [21]

Answer:

Great Britain

The French and Indian War was the North American conflict in a larger imperial war between Great Britain and France known as the Seven Years' War. The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763.

6 0
3 years ago
What territory was ganed by Israel after the 1967 six day war?
vladimir2022 [97]
The the middle east. i believe
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain ONE reason why the Eastern Roman Empire was spared much of the invasions that beset the Western Roman Empire.
    12·1 answer
  • I've been looking all over my text book and I cannot find the answer
    11·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    15·2 answers
  • Why was ivan iv known as ivan the terrible?
    13·1 answer
  • What is 90 miles south of florida and has a communist government?
    5·1 answer
  • Which Christianity city was closest to Muslim lands in Asia
    12·2 answers
  • What is a result of president teddy roosevelt's 'good neighbor policy'?
    7·1 answer
  • In which of the following colonies were the pilgrims originally supposed to sail?
    12·2 answers
  • Free 100 points
    13·1 answer
  • Which was NOT a cause of the Civil war?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!