The statement basically states “Books should show us the real world and not a fantasy where we are thought to believe things. It must guide us in our time on Earth.” You are supposed to provide your opinion on what you think.
I would write something like this:
Literature has been around for centuries, maybe even millenniums. It has brought people out of the depths of despair and helped them over come problems in day-to- day life. There are all kinds of books out there - fantasy, adventure, romance, but should all those books be forgotten and thrown out for man only to read non-fictional books that are factual rather than interesting?
On one hand, books should be used as a tool for living. They should be informative and contain facts that could benefit us through out our lifetime. An interesting quote is, ‘Knowledge is the key to life’ therefore reading non-fiction books will help us in the future and reflect our actions when we grow up.
On the other hand, books have been brought to life to transport a person away from his troubles into a fictional world, where they are happy and blissful. Taking away such books and reading only factual information will not benefit a humans mind, for they will grow old and grumpy; they will obtain a lot of information but they will be dissatisfied with life - so what is the point of that? Moreover, books are books. No matter the genre or the origination of the book, it will teach us grammar and vocabulary which is vital for a human to know; it will make us emotionally happy and we will still gain knowledge from it.
In my opinion, Forster is wrong because a work of literature MUST provide a scope for the imagination and it must alter reality a little but for us to imagine - for without imagination, we are nothing.
I hope this helps, and please tell me what grade you got as I would love to know:))
The story "Notes of a Native Son" by James Baldwin describes the stubborn pride Baldwin and his father shared that describes the gap between the generations. Thus, option C is correct.
<h3>What is a generation gap?</h3>
The complete part of the question including the options is: Which sentence best explains how the structure of the excerpt supports the author's purpose?
A. It uses the third-person point of view to convey Baldwin's inner feelings regarding his father.
B. It describes how Baldwin and his father were victims of stubbornness to reveal that pride is a sin.
C. It describes the stubborn pride Baldwin and his father shared to reveal a growing estrangement between generations.
D. It makes a statement about the generation gap that existed in America at the time.
The generation gap is a difference between the two generations that is due to the conflict between the parent and the children. The older generations have more life experiences and are more concerned.
If there is much generation gap then there is a high possibility of clashes and bad-broken relationships. There is a possibility to mend the gap by connecting with each other.
Therefore, in option C. the pride between Baldwin and his father showed the generational gap.
Learn more about "Notes of a Native Son" here:
brainly.com/question/9320711
#SPJ1
Answer:
In Antigone, Creon places greater importance on enforcing human civil law than honoring the gods and the lines in this excerpt from the play reflect the overemphasis he places on civil law is this: Of evils current upon earth The worst is money.
Answer:
Well my family and ethnicity are important to me and I have plans on carry them to college because they are what make me who I am.
Explanation:
The land is usually very dry and hot in these areas. Southwest Asia has an “Arid Climate”, which means that water (fresh) is usually scarce. South Asian in general, however, is surrounded by three bodies of water — Bay of Bengal, Indian Ocean, and the Arabian Sea — and is home to many different geographical features, like rainforests, deserts, glaciers, grasslands, and valleys.
