I believe your answer is:
economies of scale
<em>Find the given attachments for the complete solution</em>
<em />
Answer:
European colonization devastated the lives of Native Americans in the US. Currently about 5 million native Americans live in the US, while the total US population is 329.45 million (roughly 1.5%). The vast majority of Native Americans (78%) currently live in Oklahoma, Arizona, and California. none of these states was a part of the original American colonies so that can give us an idea that the general policy taken by European colonists was to wipe them out.
In the US, Native American societies were not as advanced as those societies in Mexico and Central America (Aztecs and Mayans), or the Incas in South America. At first European colonists didn't confront the Native Americans directly since they actually received a lot of help from them (remember Thanksgiving).
But as American colonies started to grow and develop, Native Americans became a problem because no one likes to be thrown out of their homes, so conflicts started.
Spanish colonists had a religious view on Native Americans and they tried to convert them to Christianity after they took everything that they considered valuable from them. Mexico which is also part of North America, currently has a very large Native American and mestizo population (combined 90%).
On the other hand, British and Dutch colonists took a different approach and once the Native Americans were not useful anymore, they basically killed them all (or the vast majority).
Answer:
Is that there is no effect on total stakeholder's equity.
Explanation:
When existing shareholders are being paid dividends as shares rather than in cash it is known as stock dividends.
Stock split can be defined as the issuance of new shares to peculiar shareholders to create multiple shares and its always in proportion to their holdings in that particular firm.
A feature common to both stock splits and stock dividends is that there is no effect on total stakeholder's equity meaning that both parameters do not reduce it.
Answer:
Option C.
Explanation:
According to the expectancy theory, or expectancy theory of motivation, an individual behaves or act in a certain way, because he/she is motivated to choose a particular behavior over others, because of what the expected result of the chosen behavior will be. What this means is that, the motivation of the behavior selection lies in the desirability of the outcome.
Expectancy theory talks about the mental processes involved as regards choice, or choosing. It attempts to show the processes that an individual undergoes in order to make choices.
As we can see in the scenario above, Richa is motivated by the belief that hard work and perseverance will help her perform well and complete the design on time, and so, this is the behavior that she has chosen, which has led to the desired outcome of completing the design on time.
