The bystander affect or bystander apathy, is a social psychological theory that states that individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when there are other people present
Disulfide bridges can be found in tertiary and quaternary structure levels of protein organization.
<h3>
What does a disulfide bridge in a protein do and what is its function?</h3><h3>
</h3>
Disulfide bonds or S-S bonds are other names for disulfide bridges. The establishment of these covalent bonds, which are formed between the sulfur atoms of two cysteine amino acids, stabilizes the tertiary and higher-order structure of proteins.
A frequent method utilized by nature to stabilize many proteins is the formation of disulfide bridges. These disulfide linkages are frequently observed in extracellular proteins that cells produce. The endoplasmic reticulum, an organelle, is where disulfide bridges are formed in eukaryotic species. When numerous proteins enter the secretory route for folding, disulfide linkages are formed between cysteine residues.
To learn more about Disulfide bridge, visit:
brainly.com/question/13416739
#SPJ4
Answer:
NATO is a military and political alliance of different countries which was created to counter Soviet and Communist power. UN stands for 'United Nations', whereas NATO stands for 'North Atlantic Treaty Organization'. It is an international government military alliance based on the North Atlantic Treaty.
NATO and the U.N. are two organizations trying to work together despite the fact that they have very different philosophies: NATO is an organization designed to fight war, if necessary, in order to defend peace; whereas the U.N. is an organization designed to avoid war in order to maintain peace.
Explanation:
please mark this answer as brainlest
The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
