The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Do you think the economic crisis that began in 2006 with the mortgage crisis has led to increased power for the presidency?
Not in that case. President Barack Obama faced one of his toughest decisions during the Freddie Mack crisis and the upcoming financial and Bank crisis in the United States. In the end, he decided to support the financial system, despite many medium and low-class Americans felt betrayed by the President's decision.
Do you think the current pandemic will result in increased presidential power?
It is probable that the actual President tries to increase his powers to make the kind of decisions needed to confront a health crisis that has turned to be an economic crisis that specialists say the US economy is in recession.
What kinds of increase in presidential power might come about as a result of such a crisis?
He can create the kind of legislation to help the country leave the economic crisis as soon as possible, knowing that he can use his veto power. As the commander in chief of the Armed Forces, he can send the national guard or some troops to reestablish the order in some regions of the country.
Do other branches of government also gain more power in such a crisis?
No, I don't think so. The President is the one who can increase his power during these difficult times over the judicial branch and the legislative branch.
Little is known about Giovanni, but ever since he started painting he was known as THE PAINTER OF NATURAL LIGHT........Also his bad is known for panting.
I think its A. I'm not entirely sure but it does seem most logical.
<u>Anyways a big reason that these powers are limited is to keep society in a stable place. Tyranny brought onto any civilization over the years has led to its downfall. This balance helps keep both the government and its people under equal terms. </u>
Its not B. because this would allow tyrant rulers to keep their position putting everyone else at a disadvantage to please themselves. This simply doesn't make sense if you were to limit the government.
C. isn't a possibility either because each government only governs over said region.
D. can also be justified under my response to B. since it has the same meaning yet is worded differently/ or relates to more modern leaders I suppose.
Anyways, I hope I was helpful and good luck :D
The comparison that Roosevelt make as he concludes his speech is the <u>universal freedom of people to that of the freedom that Americans</u> <u>have</u>. The point in doing so is to let the <u>Americans see the reason to fight the w.a.r.</u> for the Britain and the rest of the world.
In his Annual Message to Congress (State of the Union Address) on January 6, 1941, Franklin Roosevelt presented his reasons for American involvement, making the case for continued aid to Great Britain and greater production of war industries at home. In helping Britain, President Roosevelt stated, the United States was fighting for the universal freedoms that all people possessed.
<h3>Who is Roosevelt?</h3>
Franklin Delano Roosevelt is often referred to by his initials FDR, was an American politician and attorney who served as the 32nd president of the United States from 1933 until his death in 1945.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about Roosevelt: brainly.com/question/2066305
#SPJ1
