Here's a completion of the passage in the question, and the likely answer:
(I believe you are asked to complete the passage, and find the missing words).
Fortunately, in that moment of “desperate extremity,” the Powhatans brought food and rescued the starving strangers. A year later, several hundred more settlers arrived, and again they quickly ran out of provisions. They were forced to eat “dogs, cats, rats, and mice,” even “CORPSES” dug from graves. “Some have licked up the blood which hathfallen from their weak fellows,” a survivor reported. “One member of our colony murdered his wife, ripped the child out of her womb and threw it into the river, and after chopped the mother in pieces and salted her for his food, the same not being discovered before he had eaten part thereof.” “So great was our famine,” John Smith stated, “that a savage we slew and buried, the poorer sort took him up again and ate him; and so did diverse one another boiled and stewed with roots and herbs.”
One of these far good challenges
Answer:
He questions the tradition of wall-mending.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is "The emphasis of the speech stays on Wiesel's frightening experiences as a child." Wiesel's use of the first person allows him to give a more individual view of the story as a whole. These are his knowledges, they are not neutral because this is his story. The first person is the finest way for him to deliver the things he needs to tell, and the third person would have through the story more universal not personal.
Explanation:
I know that this is none of the answer choices but I hope it helps (:
