420,690 courts in da U.S heard da case befo da supreme court did
u welcome
<span>The current thinking is around 200,000 years ago, but I would argue against this by saying that humans had not yet developed the same mental capacity that we have today, as some cognitive ability would have been needed in making art, which of course seems to have appeared around 70,000 years ago in its geometric form, where as the figurative animal paintings and carvings came to be around 40-35 thousand years ago. So, humans were physically definitely modern around 200ka, but mentally, this is unlikely. It is of course possible to argue that behavioural changes need not to be dictated by physiological or cognitive changes. Art could just be an invention</span>
<span>nature wealth or high quality raw materials, low prices and competitive from international markets. It is a region where there are still large mineral reserves and water resources almost inexhaustible.
Hope this is helpful!</span>
It would be d where a king or queen rules
It is known as the Fairness Doctrine. The improvement of the communicate media brought beginning turmoil basically in light of the fact that close-by stations frequently utilized the same or contiguous radio frequencies, meddling with each other's communicates. Congress passed the Communications Act, which managed broadcasting and made the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to direct the procedure. Supporters must be authorized, and in light of the fact that the quantity of frequencies is constrained, permitting required political unbiasedness. The Communications Act additionally contained an "equivalent time" arrangement, which restricts supporters from offering or offering broadcast appointment to a political applicant without offering to offer or give an equivalent measure of broadcast appointment to different contender for a similar office.
