1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BabaBlast [244]
3 years ago
6

The beliefs of which ancient Egyptian are most similar to Abraham's beliefs?

History
2 answers:
KonstantinChe [14]3 years ago
7 0
The correct answer is Imhotep. Although Imhotep lived about 800 years before Abraham, his messages of peace and wisdom were not at all different to those of Abraham. Imhotep was hailed as a professor, an architect, but it was his religious views which we can obviously use to draw the most parallels between him and Abraham.
Softa [21]3 years ago
6 0

Imhotep or B would be the correct answer

You might be interested in
How was the Vikings life style ?
Reptile [31]

Answer:

Daily life for most men and women during the Viking Age revolved around subsistence-level farmwork. Almost everyone lived on rural farmsteads that produced most of the goods used by the people who lived there.

The work on a farmstead was divided by gender/sex. Women were customarily charged with the tasks that were performed “within the threshold” of the house, while men were charged with those tasks that lay outside of the house.

The two main tasks of women were producing clothing and preparing food. Women baked, cooked, made alcoholic drinks, and made dairy products such as milk, butter, and cheese. Milking sheep and cows were tasks that fell to women as part of this process, even though those activities were often performed outside of “the threshold.” In winter, the animals were in the homesteads’ longhouses, and so would have been inside a threshold, but in summer the animals were out grazing and were watched over by shepherds who could be either male or female.

Agricultural work, as opposed to food preparation, fell to men. This involved fertilizing, plowing, sowing, harvesting, and threshing. During the harvest, however, all members of the household would typically join in the work, since it was so laborious that all available hands were needed, be they male or female.

<em>Hope I helped You</em>

6 0
3 years ago
Why might violence be tempting to activists? Why might it be risky to their movements?
Neko [114]

Answer:

We agree with a number of Thaler’s points. First, he is right to question those on the outside who tell activists what to do or offer strategic or tactical advice. Local activists know their context best, and specific instructions from outside actors can place activists at great risk. People struggling under such conditions often say they learn the most from being in touch with other activists. But when activists approach scholars or practitioners for information or resources, it is crucial to make sure that a broad range of experience and evidence are publicly available and accessible. That was the purpose of a recent event hosted by the United States Institute of Peace that featured various scholarly and activist perspectives on how movements respond to repression.

Second, we appreciate how the article highlights the role of human agency in the struggle against authoritarianism and other forms of oppression. Civil resistance offers a way for marginalized and excluded groups to wage struggle using a wide range of direct-action tactics that can be used to disrupt injustices and challenge the status quo. It is more than simply an ideal or a normative preference. We also recognize that when activists seek out support or information, they decide for themselves whether the information is relevant to their context, or whether to discard it.

Third, we share his denunciation of repressive state violence targeting unarmed civilian dissenters. It is a regrettable reality that states often respond to those who challenge state power with violent repression, regardless of which methods of resistance they use. This state violence should never be normalized, nor should false moral equivalences or “both sides”-type narratives be tolerated. Outside actors should stand in solidarity with those fighting oppression and prioritize actions that protect fundamental human rights and mitigate violence targeting unarmed dissidents.

Yet we differ on other important points. First, critics often claim that nonviolence is part of a Western hegemonic discourse that reinforces the legitimacy of state violence while simultaneously encouraging oppressed people to carry the unfair burden of good behavior under crushing conditions. Discourses advocating nonviolent resistance are in no way hegemonic, nor are they Western in origin. Over the millennia, states and nonstate groups have justified violence on the basis of its necessity, used cultural relativism as a way to prevent critiques of violence, and persecuted, imprisoned, and executed those who have advocated nonviolent approaches, which threaten two hegemonic discourses—the state’s monopoly on power, and the normalcy and necessity of violence.

Nonviolent resistance has been a counterhegemonic force that challenges both of these dominant discourses. The technique was developed and embraced by people living under colonial regimes throughout the global south, as well as by marginalized and oppressed communities within the West. Despite their views that violence was preferable to passivity, practitioners such as Mohandas Gandhi and Badshah Khan saw mass civil resistance as the only way for them to challenge the violence of Western imperialism on pragmatic grounds. Over the course of the past century, the technique spread from the global south to the United States and Europe, where people fighting racism, sexism, poverty, war, authoritarianism, and economic inequality have seen the strategic value of fighting structural violence by building and wielding inclusive power from below using nonviolent resistance.

Activists from around the world continue to make arguments about the strategic utility of nonviolent resistance, without any nudging from Westerners or Western researchers. Protesters facing a massive crackdown in Baghdad attempted to maintain nonviolent discipline by shouting “Peaceful! Peaceful!” while under fire from security forces. Women in Lebanon have organized human chains to maintain nonviolent discipline in the ongoing movement there, which is now in a particularly delicate phase. Dissidents associated with the Sudanese Revolution insisted on maintaining a remarkable level of nonviolent discipline, despite bloody crackdowns attempting to throw the transition into disarray. And in Algeria, the ongoing movement there has remained both disruptive and restrained in its use of violence.

Our book, Why Civil Resistance Works, presents evidence that mass, broad-based participation is critical to movement success and that movements that rely primarily on nonviolent tactics tend to enjoy more diverse participation, which in turn yields a number of political advantages for the campaign. Updated analyses reinforce these earlier findings, and other research helps to unpack these dynamics at a more granular level.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Receive from a family member who has died​
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

Is that the question?

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the partisan press era do for the national debate?
Ede4ka [16]

Answer: The partisan press opened the door for conflicting ideas to be debated nationally.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which factor aided the Russians in defeating napoleons troops
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]
Russia was successful in defeating Napoleon's troops due to the weather. Napoleon had far superior troops and technology, he just left at the wrong time of the year. His men were not prepared. They were not ready for freezing temperatures. They left in the summer and didn't pack their wool uniforms because they had assumed it would be a quick win. This will also lead to Napoleon's downfall as he turns an ally into and enemy must then fight a 2-front war (fight on both sides: British in the West and Russians in the East).
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP! ONE QUESTION LEFT AND DUE TONIGHT!
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following would be a subjective source of information for details on the Revolutionary War?
    5·1 answer
  • direct involvement by one nation in the affairs of another A.urbanization B.sectionalism or C.interventon
    5·2 answers
  • A difference between Ellis island and angel island is that
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement about Harriet Tubman is true?
    14·2 answers
  • Write 3-4 sentences describing the changes in government policy toward American Indians. Why did those changes occur?
    7·2 answers
  • 25 POINTS EACH AND ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF ITS CORRECT
    5·1 answer
  • When Texas first asked to be
    12·1 answer
  • TRUE OR FALSE? The Berlin Wall was a wall built by the U.S., France and Britain to keep the Soviets from invading East Berlin.
    13·1 answer
  • 2) What is one gift China has given to world civilization?<br> that is
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!