Answer:
C. That the selling of indulgences to everyday citizens was a sinful practice
Explanation:
Jan Hus, was a Czech theologian and philosopher, rector of the Carolina University in Prague. As a reformer and preacher he is considered one of the precursors of the Protestant Reformation. His followers are known as Hussites. He died burned at the stake after being condemned for heresy at the Council of Constance.
Hus stated that the true Church was invisible and that all those who belong to the Church are its members. The Roman church has an eminent role, but it is not the true Church of Christ, since it taught that only Christ was the head of the Church. He preached that Jesus Christ was the true Stone and not Peter, and said that the pope, with his corruption and his many sins and errors that he taught to people, was the incarnation of the antichrist. Hus's criticisms are directed mainly at Antipope John XXIII, successor of Alexander V, to whom the King of Bohemia had given his obedience. To finance the war against Ladislaus, John XXIII promulgated the preaching of indulgences in Bohemia. The public demonstration of Hus caused the mistrust of the preachers sent by the antipope, which was mainly due to the fact that they were only interested in money and little to explain well the meaning of indulgences to the faithful.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
In 1939, Joseph Stalin was convinced that Germany would win the war, or either be a strong contender against Britain and France.
We can safely say this because by that time, Stalin had agreed with Hitler to a pact of non-aggression known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. According to this pact, the Soviet Union would not interfere with Nazi Germany affairs, and would actually work with Nazi Germany in the invasion of Poland, by invading from the east, while Germany invaded from the west, an action that resulted in the quick defeat of Poland, and the partition of its territory between the two countries.
Answer:
Maryland, Virginia, North and South Carolina, and Georgia.
Explanation:
The Roman Forum was a place where people gossip, chat, and shop. There were also public speeches, criminal trials, gladiatorial matches, and elections
Answer:
Southerners argued that giving the poor workers the right to vote would destroy society, so the government should remain in the hands of the best representatives of society. Their argument was that allowing workers to vote means leading to a redistribution of wealth. Republican politicians will appease black voters by adhering to a policy that will provide jobs and service for blacks, they said. Former slaves will be ready for anything if only not to work in the agriculture for a low salary, so that the real production needed by the South will be replaced by unproductive, but highly paid government posts.
Explanation:
Republicans unconditionally supported the Reconstruction, which called for the upholding of suffrage for black men in the former states of the Confederation “for reasons of public safety and justice.” However, the desire to give former slaves the right to vote found opponents not only in the South. Grant believed that the northerners would not like the provision of voting rights to blacks. This circumstance explained the presence of provisions designed to hold the votes of dissatisfied northerners in the republican platform, namely: the issue of suffrage in all loyal states properly belongs to the people of these states. Since the southern democrats were mostly “deeply calculating abolitionists,” they regarded the Blacks solely as an instrument of pressure on the ‘unreliable’ white southerners and did not intend to provide real assistance to the former slaves. Democrats shied away from solving the problem, noting that the issue should be considered only after the restoration of the southern states in their rights. However, in their platform, they demanded the introduction of control over the process of granting voting rights to all male citizens, which meant the establishment of obstacles for black voters.