The sentence has a vague pronoun problem because it is unclear if the police officer or the criminal tripped and fell. In order to correct this, the sentence needs to be more specific. We can say any of the following sentences:
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>the officer </u>tripped and fell.
- It is clear that the officer fell.
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>the criminal </u>tripped and fell.
- It is clear the criminal fell.
This sentence wouldn't necessarily work with the original sentence since we can infer that only one of them fell because the writer used he. However, if both of them fell, it would be correct as well.
The police officer chased the criminal through the streets until <u>they</u> tripped and fell.
Ahem, well the audience will be towards kids. Kids love pets, we know they love pets, who doesn't love pets. You know what they love the most? Puppies. & Do you know who they bug about getting a puppy? Their parent. You target the children, that's who your audience is. Now for the two paragraphs...(maybe)
Dogs, I believe are an essential part of a human's life. They can bring comfort, protection, happiness into one's life. They can be used for jobs. What kind of jobs you're asking yourself, well you've asking the wrong person. Ask me instead, they can be used as a service dog, they can get the sheep together, they can even be provided for therapy. Taking care of a dog is a HUGE responsibility and should be taken very seriously. They need to be fed the right type of food. Depending on what type of breed they are of course. They need to be taken on walks, taken to the vet for a check out, cut their nails. They're basically a child, but better.
1. The judge said he would declare a mistrial if the jury did not reach its verdict today.
2. He tried to ingratiate herself with the director, in the hope of getting promotion.
