Answer:
e
Explanation:
spain and france attacked u.s but theure all powerful
In the image that is most commonly associated with her, Rosie is depicted as a symbol of female empowerment.
In the song Rosie the riveter, she was introduced as a female with a gun resting on her lap.
In the most common image of her, Rosie is depicted as a person that is used to boost morale.
She is shown wearing a bandanna in a poster that has her flexing her muscles. The caption under this image has the words, yes we can do it.
This image became common with the feminist movement at the time. They used it as a source of female empowerment.
Read more on Rosie the Riveter here:
brainly.com/question/1154933?referrer=searchResults
Yes, I agree that Indian removal from their lands leads to the end of United States' "civilization project".
I agree that the Indian removal in the 19th century marked the end of the United States' "civilization project" because the displacement of Indians from their original regions and used that land for the settlement of Americans leads to the ending of America's civilization.
American Indians were the real owners and inhabitants of United states of America and they had a unique civilization and traditions so we can conclude that Indian removal from their lands leads to the end of United States' "civilization project".
Learn more: brainly.com/question/25824369
Federalism is a mix or compound mode of government that combines a general government with regional governments in a single political system is distinctive feature first embodied in the constitution of the United States of 1789, it’s a relationship of parity between the two levels of government established a can thirst be defined as a form of government in which powers are divided between two levels of government of equal status
The American colonists were justified in doing this simply because their colonies had become too big and too important to be treated as a colony by the British. The British should have given the colonies some autonomy, but they did not. The analogy I like to use is that of teens and their parents. Parents have to give teens more independence as they grow up. If they do not, the teens may justifiably rebel.
The British were not, on the whole, brutal or oppressive towards the colonists. However, they would not let the colonists have much in the way of self-rule. This had been fine when the colonies were still small and economically weak. By the 1760s and 1770s, however, the colonies were "teenagers." They were big and strong enough to expect some autonomy. When Britain reacted to requests for autonomy by being more strict, the colonists were justified in rebelling.