Answer: The writer talks about their perspective on The Narrow Fellow. It starts out mild, then the last stanza almost disses the Narrow Fellow, as read in ' And Zero at the Bone '. It's admirable since the Narrow is described with the most descriptive words, and it almost seems that the Narrow Fellow is a good person. It's also terrifying since it has quite a volta in the last stanza.
Explanation:
Answer:
Hamlet's speech from Act V scene i of the play "Hamlet".
Explanation:
These lines are said by Hamlet in Act V scene i of the tragedy play "Hamlet"by William Shakespeare. This play centers on the revenge act by a young prince for the murder of his father by his uncle. The play also shows the greed of the new King Claudius and the lengths he would go to conceal his secret.
The particular passage given in the question is from the dialogue of Hamlet when they were in the graveyard, talking of the different skulls the gravediggers had dug out. Hamlet asked Horatio or rather told him about how life and death can be so different. One can be the ruler of a mighty empire but after death, returns to the same dust that everyone turns back to. He further puts his point forward by suggesting that what if the dust of Alexander or Caesar for that matter, be used as clay to "<em>patch a wall t' expel the winter’s flaw!</em>"
The above question wants to assess your ability to read, interpret and write. For that reason, it's not right for me to write down the logical analysis you need, but I'll show you how to write one.
First, you need to know that the letter Benjamin Banneker wrote to Thomas Jefferson was intended to convince him to fight for abolitionism.
That's because Benjamin Banneker had joined a group of men who were in favor of ending slavery, but he knew politically relevant men needed to join that group and support abolitionism and so he wrote the letter to Jefferson.
In this case, the entire letter shows that objective, presenting Jefferson the reasons that make abolitionism a good policy for America and the reasons that make slavery bad.
Based on this, to write your logic analysis you should:
- Read the entire text and reread if necessary.
- Start your analysis by showing what the letter is and what its main purpose is.
- Show how the author develops this goal.
- Show how the sentences the author uses to defend his position on the subject of the letter.
- Assess whether the type of language the author presented is appropriate.
- Show how the author presents slavery and ways to combat it.
- Show your opinion of the letter and the way its author approaches the subject presented.
More information:
brainly.com/question/24751035?referrer=searchResults
Global warming is not a prediction. It is happening right now. It is a current increase in temperature of the Earth atmosphere, water, and surface. Human activities produce greenhouse gases that accumulate in the atmosphere and cause problems our planet faces today. Global warming can do more than just melt polar ice and change weather patterns throughout the world.
It can change our maps, displace people from tropical islands and cities, and cause famine. There is no debate within the scientific community. The scientific evidence of the global warming is clear. The consequences of this global problem will only intensify if we do not confront the realities of climate change. Mankind should achieve some meaningful solutions in order to address the threat of global warming. We should stop deforestations, reduce carbon emissions, and fight misinformation. People should be prepared for the inevitable consequences of the global warming. It is our today`s reality and we should be responsible for doing so much harm to our planet Earth.
