Hey! :)
Industrialization in the UK, and this answer will narrow the UK down to Great Britain and England was indeed different than the industrialization in China. Even without breaking down China's industrialization to the time before and after the Communist Party took over China in 1950, the two countries' industrialization process was vastly different. Here is why:
<span>
England's industrial revolution had its roots in the later part of the 17th Century while China's began much later.
Hope this helps! :)</span>
Answer:
Cooperative federalism, also known as marble-cake federalism, is defined as a flexible relationship between the federal and state governments in which both work together on a variety of issues and programs.
Marble Cake Federalism is a form of federalism where there is mixing of powers, resources, and programs between and among the national, state, and local governments. ... In marble cake federalism there will be an intermingling of all levels of government in policies and programming.
Explanation:
Answer:
Wealth among European working classes
Explanation:
Considering that New Imperialism is characterized by the form of colonialism whereby many Europeans including the likes of the United States, Russia, and Japan controlled the resources and affairs of smaller nations or territories across the continents.
During this period, the colonial countries or masters brought their working class to the colonized territories and work there such that they earn more money and accumulate more wealth compared to the previous period.
Hence, Wealth among European working classes is what grew during the New Imperialism
The answer would be A. The land was divided into smaller plots with housing for sharecroppers because after the war slavery was outlawed so former slaves only knew how to farm and in order to get income they went back to plantations as sharecroppers.
Sharecroppers were people who rented out housing and tools with a share of their crops in order to live.
<span>Roger Sherman is a relatively unknown politician in American history; however, he holds a distinction that no other historical figure—including James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington—can claim.</span>
