Choosing not to back either side is known as neutrality. India would have been considered neutral in the conflict.
I don't really understand the difference between these two, politically, culturally, and economically. All I know between the two is that the Roman Republic are for the citizens of Rome. However, the Roman Empire is ruled by a Emperors. Now, the connotations of emperors are considered bad I think. But isn't Marcus Aurelius and Augustus very good leaders. Does anyone have some insight on how Roman R and Roman E differ from each other.
The Aztec government was similar to a <u>monarchy</u> where an Emperor or King was the primary ruler. They called their ruler the Huey Tlatoani. The Huey Tlatoani was the ultimate power in the land. They felt that he was appointed by the gods and had the divine right to rule.
Answer:
Explanation:
They established Greek colonies from 1000 to 650 B.C.E. Their colonies were located in Spain, France, Italy, and Africa, and along the coast of the Black Sea.
These locations were chosen mainly for trade.
