The text structure with the kind of information an author would present using that structure is differentiated down below:
Explanation:
Descriptive is the text structure an author uses which gives Information to help create a mind picture
Cause and effect
is the text structure an author uses which Makes the reader understand why something happened
.
Compare and contrast is the text structure an author uses which Shows what is the same and what is different between something
Argumentative is the text structure an author uses which gives Information that persuades the reader to the author's opinion
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
In D, Jane feels bad about her action and conflicts with her FEELINGS about that action, meaning the conflict in this case would be internal or person vs. self specifically (the self being Jane's feelings).
Hope this helped somewhat! :P
Answer:
A government curfew would prevent fights and arguments between parents and children on the topic of curfews. In a survey of 100 parents, 90 percent agreed with the idea that discussing curfews is stressful for parents and children. Plus, 60 percent said that enforcing a curfew was very difficult because children mostly reacted negatively. Finally, 75 percent of the parents felt that constant arguments on the topic caused everyone at home to be upset. Getting teenagers to stick to a curfew is no easy task because they, understandably, don’t like curfews. In many homes, curfews cannot be discussed without the slamming of doors or the smashing of a dish or two. But if a citywide curfew became the law, children would understand the seriousness of it. And parents would have an easier time convincing their kids to obey the rule. The fear of getting questioned by the police would further motivate children to obey the law. Additionally, a government curfew would force neglectful parents to keep tabs on the whereabouts of their children at night.
Explanation:
A government curfew would prevent fights and arguments between parents and children on the topic of curfews. In a survey of 100 parents, 90 percent agreed with the idea that discussing curfews is stressful for parents and children. Plus, 60 percent said that enforcing a curfew was very difficult because children mostly reacted negatively. Finally, 75 percent of the parents felt that constant arguments on the topic caused everyone at home to be upset. Getting teenagers to stick to a curfew is no easy task because they, understandably, don’t like curfews. In many homes, curfews cannot be discussed without the slamming of doors or the smashing of a dish or two. But if a c
itywide curfew became the law, children would understand the seriousness of it. And parents would have an easier time convincing their kids to obey the rule. The fear of getting questioned by the police would further motivate children to obey the law. Additionally, a government curfew would force neglectful parents to keep tabs on the whereabouts of their children at night.
I’d personally say C but I’m unsure
