1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina86 [1]
3 years ago
13

During the year, Belyk Paving Co. had sales of $2,485,000. Cost of goods sold, administrative and selling expenses, and deprecia

tion expense were $1,349,000, $660,000, and $462,000, respectively. In addition, the company had an interest expense of $287,000 and a tax rate of 24 percent. The company paid out $412,000 in cash dividends. Assume that net capital spending was zero, no new investments were made in net working capital, and no new stock was issued during the year. (lgnore any tax loss or carryforward provision and assume interest expense is fully deductible.)
Calculate the firm's net new long-term debt added during the year. (Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to the nearest whole number, e.g., 32.)
Business
1 answer:
Afina-wow [57]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

$888,000

Explanation:

In order to determine how much new debt was added, we must calculate cash flows:

first we need to determine net income:

sales ($2,485,000) - COGS ($1,349,000) - S&A expenses ($660,000) - depreciation expense ($462,000) = EBIT = $14,000

since EBIT is lower than interest expense ($14,000 ≤ $287,000), we can assume there was a loss. But the question tells us to ignore any tax losses. So net income = $14,000 - $287,000 = -$273,000

operating cash flow = net income + adjustments = -$273,000 + $462,000 = $189,000

there were not capital spending and no new investments made, so cash flow from investing activities = $0

so the net cash flow from assets = $189,000

net cash flow form assets = net cash flow from stockholders + net cash flow from liabilities

net cash flow from stockholders = common stock issued - dividends = $0 - $412,000 = -$412,000

$189,000 = -$412,000 + net cash flow from liabilities

$601,000 = net cash flow from liabilities

net cash flow from liabilities = net new long term debt - interest expense

$601,000 = net new long term debt - $287,000

net new long term debt = $601,000 + $287,000 = $888,000

You might be interested in
Marigold Corp. self-insures its property for fire and storm damage. If the company were to obtain insurance on the property, it
DENIUS [597]

Answer:

loss on fire and storms 710,000

insurance expense zero as the firm didn't acquire any

Explanation:

Notice it state <u><em>"if the company were to obtain insurance"</em></u> Which means it currently has none insurance.

If the firm had an insurance the amount of losses would be deducted from the insurance policy but there is none so we disclosure the entire loss as a result of the period.

Hence, we should recognize the entire loss on fire and storm damage of 710,000 during the year and no insurance expense.

8 0
3 years ago
Please help ASAP will give 25 points.
m_a_m_a [10]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

cuz dahvvhjfjhasjvgdvdsGHGhgdyhhgvlkmn,vzcnfdmndmdfnbdfbhcdhjcbcbdbnf

4 0
3 years ago
Dakota Products uses a job-costing system with two direct-cost categories (direct materials and direct manufacturing labor) and
IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

1.Overhead Rate = Overhead Costs/ Direct Labor Costs

Budget Overhead Rate = 3060,000/ 1700,000= 1.8

Actual Overhead Rate = 3217,500/ 1650,000= 1.895

Dakota Products

                                Budget for 2017                  Actual Results for 2017

Direct material costs $2,250,000                          $2,150,000

Direct manufacturing labor costs 1,700,000          1,650,000

Manufacturing overhead costs 3,060,000            3,217,500

2.During March, the job-cost record for Job 626

Direct materials used $55,000

Direct manufacturing labor costs $45,000

Actual Overhead  = 1.895 * $45,000= $ 85295.45

Normal Overhead = 1.8 * 45,000= $ 81,000

2.The  actual cost of Job 626 =$ 55,000+ $ 45,000+ $ 85295.45= $ 185,295.45

2.The  normal cost of Job 626 =$ 55,000+ $ 45,000+ $ 81,000= $181,000

3. Under- or Overallocated Overhead under normal costing=

     Budgeted Overhead - Actual Overhead= 3,060,000 -  3,217,500=

157,500 underapplied

There is no under- or overallocated overhead under actual costing because  overhead costs actually are at their actual costs. There is no difference between calculated and actual.

4. Normal Costing would give an idea before 2017 and it is easier to make decision prior to changes. Actual results can only be obtained after the process. Managers find it easier to pre plan . So normal costing is adoptable.

4 0
3 years ago
ABC Residential Investors, LLP, is considering the purchase of a 120-unit apartment complex in Steel City, Pennsylvania. A marke
hoa [83]

Answer:

The estimate value of the subject property is $8,269,200

The other information that would be desirable in reaching a conclusion:

The closeness of the property to central business districts as the closer it is the higher the asking price.

The estimate was solely based on revenue, the applicable costs have been ignored.

The average taken might not be a good indication for the subject property because the property might have unique features

Explanation:

The formula for Gross Rent Multiplier is given  Property Price / Gross Monthly Rental Income.

In determining the estimate value of the subject property ,we calculate the gross rent multiplier of the new property,then multiply it  with the annual rental income.

In ascertaining the GRM of the new property we take the average GRM of the two similar properties in the same area.This is because the new property judging from number of units, lies in-between the other two properties.

GRM for Oaks

GRM=$9000000/($550*140)

GRM =116.88

GRM for Palms

GRM=$6,600,000/($650*90)

GRM =112.82

The average GRM=(116.88+112.82)/2

                               =114.85

Subject property price=114.85*(120*$600)

                                     =$8,269,200

4 0
3 years ago
You manage an equity fund with an expected risk premium of 13% and a standard deviation of 44%. The rate on Treasury bills is 6.
Nady [450]

Answer and Explanation:

The computation of the expected return and the standard deviation is given below:

the expected return is

= $90,000 × 13% + $60,000 × 6.6%

= $15,660.00

And,

standard deviation of return is

= $90,000 × 13% × 44% + $60,000 × 6.6%

= $5,148 + $3,960

= $9,108.00

In this way it should be calculated

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You are the manager of a firm producing green chalk. The marginal product of labor is:
    15·1 answer
  • Can you point out some differenced between welfare definition and scarcity and choice
    8·1 answer
  • The basic rest-activity cycle is about 30 minutes in length <br> a. True <br> b. False
    13·1 answer
  • Classify the given goods according to whether or not they would be included in calculating the GDP for the United States. All go
    14·1 answer
  • Technical analysts consider the stock market to be strong when volume _________ in a rising market and _________ during a declin
    12·1 answer
  • The theory that real shocks to the economy are the primary cause of business cycles is
    13·1 answer
  • embroidered dog apparel over the Internet. Her annual revenue is​ $128,000 per​ year, the explicit costs of her business are​ $4
    15·1 answer
  • A manufacturer makes and sells 2 products, P and Q. The revenue from the sale of each unit of P is $20.00 and the revenue from t
    5·1 answer
  • Should all managers must always aim for the top position?why or why not
    14·2 answers
  • How often does the price you pay for a haircut change? What does your answer imply about the usefulness of market-clearing model
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!