Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
The development of the steam engine....of that is an option. You really should include the choices.
Hi i hope you have a good day
La constitución es la carta magna de un estado. ... La redacción de una constitución se basa en el principio de que el poder político de una nación debe ser ejercido de forma racional y organizada. Además, establece una separación de poderes que impide el absolutismo.
The innovation that enabled ordinary people to buy cars was <span>Henry Ford's assembly line, which made cars inexpensive because they were able to produce them more efficiently and faster.</span>
