Answer: Pretttyyyy sure it’s the effects of living in a multicultural society. (Don’t quote Tem on that though)
To the left you put info about how the federalist were different from the antis and on the right you but how the antis were different from the federalists and in the middle to put what they had in common, like they disliked each other.
Racism against Mexican- Puerto Ricans
Hope this helps Buddy!
Welcome to Brainly.
- Courtney
Historians view the Chester Arthur presidency as an important
surprise, one that no one would have expected. Put simply, he performed
well in office, defying his state-based reputation as a slick machine
politician. Despite his poor health, he attempted to govern competently,
and he succeeded to a degree that was never acknowledged by his fellow
politicians, the press, or the great mass of Americans.
Although Arthur preferred efficient partisan government service to
one selected by competitive examinations, he nevertheless showed
tremendous flexibility and a willingness to embrace reform. By
struggling with the tariff issue (especially being willing to question
the protectionist doctrines of the Republican Party) and supporting the
modernization of the American Navy, Arthur stands as an important
transitional figure in the reunification of the nation after the bitter
turmoil of the Civil War and Reconstruction. No party hack, Arthur
demonstrated how the office of President could bring out the very best
in its occupants.
Let me know if i had helped you please and thanks
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Yes, the nation achieve the goals that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. set in his Letter from Birmingham Jail because the battle against racial segregation was fought in the courts, not the streets. There are many examples in which we can see that cases of racial segregation were settled in the courts not in the streets which shows that the nation achieve the goals of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
