Answer
Evidence says its Eratosthenes (E man)
Answer:
D
Explanation:
<h3><u><em>
Majority party leaders can choose committee heads and direct the creation of legislation and policy</em></u>. ... The bill is sent to a conference committee to work out differences between the Senate and House. The bill is sent to the President for his signature.</h3>
Answer: The places they took over were divided into Arab Muslims and non-Arab Muslims. This led to tension and conflict among the varying ethnicities. Also because of bad leaders.
They taxed the colonists without them being represented in the gov.
Answer:
We don't really have direct democracies in most cases. If we did, the laws would be created by the people. But we do have democratic republics. The laws are created by elected representatives and then, depending on the level, signed into being by the executive, i.e. governor or President. In a monarchy you often have the monarch working with some kind of elected body these days, so that would be similar to elected representatives creating the law and then approval at the executive level. But in a true monarchy, I suppose just the monarch. The same would be the case in a dictatorship, where the executive would make the laws, often with the assistance of a closed group of powerful individuals. Frequently the military will have some involvement. In some systems, you have administrative agencies created that can then create rules which must be obeyed, though those agencies can be controlled by the other involved bodies which actually pass the laws as opposed to create rules. Example, the FTC, FDA, NLRB in the US.
Explanation:
Hope this helps, this took me awhile to type but its worth helping someone :)