Answer:
O b. They support the practice of overfishing.
Explanation:
As seen in the given passage, the main issue is that of the misuse of government subsidies. Though such subsidies are intended to help struggling fisheries, it has also led to some unintended effect.
One such unintended effect is that these subsidies support overfishing. Overfishing is when more than the required or supported number of fishes are put in a single space or area. so, what the author presents is that government subsidies unintentionally help such overfishing that it has become a problem rather than helping it.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
This event would have a huge impact on those hiding in the annex.
They are hiding in Holland, so a British invasion would directly impact them. While they'd welcome the British removing the Germans, they would have to contend with Germany defending their territory first.
To that end, the Germans treated to flood Holland. If so, the members of the annex would have to decide whether to stay or flee. Either one could be deadly. The Germans might also forcibly evacuate Holland. If that were the case, they would again have to decide whether to continue to hide in an abandoned city or leave and risk being caught by the Germans.
Ultimately, they decide that it would be best to remain in hiding.
Okay, I saw another question like this before. I cant write an essay for you. But I can give you pointers and tips.
