The answer is b) It created resentment and often hindered negotiations in Europe.
Let's look into it one by one:
a) It established unity and peace among European countries. -This is not true.
-Nationalism has caused the civilian of nations to want to protect themselves as well as get national glory by getting land. This caused territorial conflict and hostility between each nations instead of peace and unity.
b) It created resentment and often hindered negotiations in Europe. - This is correct.
-As mentioned, nationalism has caused conflicts of territorial interest between nations. The nations were wary against one another that they might be attacked. They are also unwilling to back down in order to get national glory and show their superiority of the nation. This had indeed caused resentment and many negotiations went unsuccessful such as the disarmament conference.
c)The feelings of nationalism created a wave a optimism about peace in Europe. - This is incorrect.
- The feeling of nationalism had caused the up rise of aggression which made the nations to be suspicious towards one another causing negative impact about peace in Europe.
d) Nationalism had no impact on Europe during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.-This is false.
-As the above mentioned, nationalism had significant impact on the development in Europe.
Therefore the answer is b) It created resentment and often hindered negotiations in Europe.
Hope it helps!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide options or statements to answer it, we can say that Northwest Coast Indians were able to live in permanent villages because of the following factors. These North American Indian tribes from the Pacific could settle in a land where the weather conditions allowed them to grow some crops, the climate was not as extreme as in the East, and had the enormous advantage to live next to the Pacific harbor, so the could benefit from the sea. They were good fishermen and always had food for their families in the form of salmon, shellfish, clams, fruits, and some vegetables.
Answer:
That's exciting! But please tell me, what is your question?? :D
The study of historical writing
The answer is <span>The provisons were too loose to offer clear methods of enforcement
</span>
