The correct answer would be, Predicts.
Suppose Abby finds a significant positive correlation between the hours that a child watches TV and the number of aggressive behaviors the child displays in the classroom. She concludes correctly that TV watching predicts aggressive behavior.
Explanation:
When doing a research, researchers try to study the relationship between different factors to reach to a conclusion. Usually different variables are seen and tested, and if significant correlation if found, then results are inferred.
So when Abby conducted a research about the reason of aggressive behaviors in children in their classrooms, she used a variable, 'watching TV', and found that TV watching predicts the aggressive behavior.
This means that TV watching by children predicts and cause aggression in them.
Learn more about aggressive behavior at:
brainly.com/question/2034237
#LearnWithBrainly
1st one is : "Specialization"
2nd one is : "Scarcity"
3rd one is : "Cottage Industry"
4th one is : "Assembly line"
5th one is : "Mass Production"
6th one is : "Unskilled labor"
Hope this helps! :D
Answer:
bona fide occupational qualifications
Explanation:
In this scenario, the government likely was able to prevail because of bona fide occupational qualifications. This refers to a quality or an attribute that employers are allowed to consider when deciding whether or not to hire an individual candidate. Usually, this is in regard to a quality or trait, that under other circumstances, would be considered discrimination. In this case, the trait in question is Fluent Bilingual Skills, and here it is not considered discrimination because this skill is necessary and an employee without them may put lives at risk.
I think it's the third option. Not entirely sure though.
The guy above me is right. D is correct
