The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I would respond to an attorney who argues that the First Amendment protects the actions of paparazzi in any circumstance, without exception, in the following way.
People have the right to exert their own freedom to the degree they do not mess with my freedom of defending my privacy or they do not mess with the privacy of other people.
So this means paparazzi have the freedom to allow for the best shots of artists or public figures when these public figures are in a public sphere or scene: working, public appearances, red carpets, and so on
But there is a fine but notorious line that these paparazzi must never cross. And that is the private life of people. And that always must be respected, no matter what.
Private life is of no interest to the audiences.
The Golden Gate Bridge 1937 opening
Landmarks in the San Francisco Bay Area
The history of Golden Gate Bridge
The Golden Gate Bridge
1. summarize the plot briefly (the readers of the critique need to know what the story is about)
2. briefly give author's background (it may have an effect on the story)
3. give strengths and weaknesses (you need to show both the good and the bad parts)
4. point out examples of style (style is also very important in stories)
5. identify characters (you are going to critique their portrayal anyways)
6. make the conflict clear
7. recommend to certain type of reader (so that other readers know this isn't something they'd like)
Answer:
celebrity auctions can be very weird. However, occasionally, there is some semblance of sanity to the whole process.
One thing that stands out clearly from the passage is that hunting for this celebrity paraphernalia is just human nature. In paragraph three, there is evidence from archeological records to demonstrate this.
Perhaps another contributory factor, besides the fact that there are people who use these things for a good cause, is that money follows sentiments.
For a family who is in the tennis business one way or another, getting hold of one of Senera Williams' tennis rackets would provide an immense source of emotional or sentimental satisfaction. People in the same industry would feel that way too.
If one person places value on a thing, it may hold no value at all. But if there is a whole industry of professionals, who make a living off celebrity auctions, the chances are that everyone will start to see opportunities even with the most bizarre celebrity artifacts.
In the end, whether this habit is for opportunistic reasons, emotional reasons, or philanthropic reasons, it's all about human nature.
Explanation:
hope this helps! happy holidays.
