Answer: The strange case of Dr Jekyll mad mr Hyde.
Explanation: The story begins with Utterson and Enfield who were taking their regular walk on Sunday. As these two walked down a street, Mr. Enfield saw an abandoned building which reminded him of an odd story. He narrates the story to his cousin, Mr. Utterson. He said that he had witnessed a man trample over a young girl because she mistakenly ran into him. After their conversation, Mr. Utterson proceeds home. In his study, he found a will of Dr. Jekyll, his friend. Mr Utterson was bothered by the fact that his friend’s will is in favor of a stranger named Mr. Edward Hyde. He asked Dr. Lanyon, their mutual friend, if he knew who Edward Hyde was. Unfortunately, Dr. Lanyon complained that he had not heard anything about Hyde and he had cut ties with Dr. Jekyll because they had a science based disagreement.
Explanation:
closest to England by ship
and? you need to put the rest of the question. I mean like good for John for getting a part lol.
Assuming that the bolded word is winner, the correct answer is object complement.
The word winner refers to the word <em>play - </em>and given that the word play is the direct object of this sentence, then the word <em>winner </em>will be its complement - it will complete it, and answer the question What did the critics declare the play to be?
It cannot be a predicate nominative because it is not preceded by a verb. It cannot be a direct object because that is <em>the play. </em>It cannot be a predicate adjective because it is a noun, not an adjective.
Answer:
In conclusion or last but not least
Explanation:
