They were better because there was more space (it wasn't already taken by the country industrialising itself), and there was no competition from the country itself, it's like us walking into a tribe nowadays, our technology is <em>extremely</em> superior so we could waltz in if we wanted to, in so if someone expanded from a modern society into a non industrialised country it would be effortless.
ibutes have been devoted to it, re-creations staged of it, and books written about it. It is surely fair to say that no other American speech has ever inspired so much writing and so many more speeches. This paper may be the latest, but it certainly will not be the last.
Perhaps what makes the speech especially appealing to modern Americans are the handicaps Lincoln faced in delivering it: a late invitation to appear; a rude reminder that he should deliver no more than “a few appropriate remarks”; the distraction of a sick child at home; an unenviable spot on the program that day—following a stem-winder by the greatest orator of the era; and Lincoln’s deep aversion to public speechmaking of any kind once he became president. We have come to love the Gettysburg Address, in part, because in spite of all these obstacles Lincoln somehow composed a masterpiece
hope that helps
<span>The biggest problem with the OPA during WWII was controlling prices. Prices were soaring and keeping them down was the biggest problem they faced.</span>
Russia left ww1 because in 1917 Germany agree to an armistice and peace with Russia. So my though is they lost in WW1
