All categories

4 years ago

Compare the development of mining ranching and farming in the west. how did their environmental consequences differ

2 answers:

7 0

In Mining, Farmers had to deal with a pile of pests and tornadoes as well as bugs that destroyed their crops whereas the other two were more serious then farmer’s situation.

Further Explanation:

During the period of the early 1840s, The western part of America was very less occupied and the majority of people who used to live in these areas were native Americans and most of them were Spanish speaking settlers and were dominant in the southwest. Spanish speaking settlers came to Southwest American in the late 1500s and they were mostly occupied in Ranching and Farming related works and mining was also part of their work but it only occurred in some areas. The quest for Gold was the reason that thousands of immigrants came to the west in 1848. During the period of Gold Rush, around 100,000 people came migrated to California to make their fortune.

If we talk about farming during that era, Then there were harsh conditions for the farmers as they had to face pile of pets and Bugs in their farms which destroyed their farms and there were no sprays introduced during that period of time which was effective to kill these pests and because of that the Farmers of west were forced to find new ways of farming.

Learn More:

1. How were people in the middle colonies different from those in the new England and southern colonies?

brainly.com/question/1720656

2. When the united states decided to build a canal across Central America, Panama was

brainly.com/question/1263215

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Mining and Farming in West

Subject: History

Keywords: History, United States, Mining, Farming, Ranching, Native Americans, Immigrants, Gold Rush, California, Migrated.

Vitek1552 [10]4 years ago

5 0

Farming: The practice of agriculture might be the least impactful compared to ranching and mining. The consistent use of land for vegetation consumes all the nutrients a plot of soil can offer; crop rotation is a viable solution to this problem. The environmental footprint of farming becomes airborne (and still affects the soil) once insecticides are used to protect crops from potential plagues.

Mining: Mining can cause pollution in every medium possible, depending on the location it is practiced on. It affects air when unrefined materials are released to the surface; causes the destruction of soil and vegetation once these are removed to reach the minerals undergound; contaminate water when draining acid from mines and increasing sedimentation on water streams; reduces biodiversity by destroying natural habitats.

Ranching: The great amounts of livestock release high levels of carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere, degradating everything the gas emissions reach. This results in water degradation, biodiversity loss, air pollution, deforestation, and acid rain. Cattle is one of the highest factors that contribute to climate change.

It can be concluded that Mining and Ranching are similar in the areas of affection, but differ in the mediums to do it. Farming does not create as much pollution as these two, and its effects are somewhat reversible.

You might be interested in

Which class doubled in size during the years between 1900 and 1925? A. wealthy class B. working class C. middle class D. farming

vagabundo [1.1K]

Middle class doubled in the years between 1900 and 1925 .

C. middle class

Explanation:

It presents that first comprehensive, long-run payroll knowledge on Swedish middle-class employees ere the twentieth century. Our data cover, for example, academy teachers, instructors, assistants, policemen and porters in Stockholm and Sweden, ca. 1830–1940.

We utilise the current data to analyse the annual incomes of these middle-class workers with the annual incomes of farmworkers, uneducated production operators and manufacturing workers.

The outcomes show that the pay gap between the middle class and the working class grow drastically from the mid-nineteenth century to a historically high level throughout the 1880s and 1890s.

7 0

3 years ago

Why did interstate transportation become a good target for integration activities in the 1960s?

san4es73 [151]

Interstate transportation was governed by federal law.


interstate transportation become a good target for integration activities in the 1960s because it was governed by federal laws. It was easier to desegregate than other local based functions.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What were the top three nations receiving remittances in 2004?

yanalaym [24]

Out of the choices given, the top 3 nations receiving remittances in 2004 were India, China, and Mexico.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What term refers to the portion of a corporation profits that are paid to stockholders

Scorpion4ik [409]

Dividends are the corporation profits that are paid to stockholders.

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In this speech alexander kerensky calls for?

tangare [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

Kerensky’s intuitive knowledge of the appropriate action to take in the early days of the Revolution was unmatched by the other leading political figures of the time. In March 1917, when former Tsarist ministers were seized in the street and roughly escorted to the Winter Palace, Kerensky stepped forward and declared them ‘prisoners of the revolution’. He also issued the arrest of Minster of War Vladimir Sukhomlinov – for so long, a symbol of power and corruption in the old regime – something his colleagues lacked the courage to do. Kerensky could see that only by legitimising their capture with arrest could protect them from the angry mobs in Petrograd.

The ability to deliver speeches that would connect with audiences was an important skill for any public figure in 1917. Kerensky’s experience as an advocate served him well in this respect. Although his speeches were rather cliché ridden, they were very successful, making direct appeals to ‘his people’ and tears would sometimes be seen running down his face as he spoke.

But soon his tone changed, especially after the attempted Bolshevik rising of July, becoming increasingly authoritarian. Where once he had appealed directly to the goodness of the people, now he called for the preservation of the State.

Despite this, it is difficult to find strong evidence for his well-reported egotism. Kerensky was the only moderate prepared to take on the responsibility of heading Russia, and faced criticism from across the political spectrum when he was unable to avert the Bolshevik seizure of power and subsequent descent into civil war.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers