Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": The government implemented a generous welfare plan 3 years ago to support people who cannot find work.
Explanation:
According to the excerpt, a government implemented fiscal policies to increase employment for the past two years but the rate has not risen since then. One of the reasons for such a situation could be <em>generous welfare support</em> implemented one year before the fiscal policy measures started.
<em>If the benefits for the unemployed increase they will be discouraged to return to the labor force</em>. It implies the government should keep the welfare benefits at a level from where unemployed individuals can cover basic needs only but encourage them to find a job to be productive for the economy.
Answer:
$207.06 million
Explanation:
First and foremost, it should be borne in mind that the price of a zero-coupon bond is the present value of its face value since the bond does not pay any coupons over its tenor as shown thus:
PV of bonds=FV/(1+i)^n
PV of bonds=amount required=$111 million
FV=face value=the unknown
i=semiannual yield = 4.2%/2=2.1%
n=number of semiannual periods in 15 years=15*2=30
$111=FV/(1+2.1%)^30
FV=$111*(1+2.1%)^30
FV=$207.06 million
Answer:
$1,300
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what the market maker’s net profit from Brent’s transaction
First step is to calculate the bid-ask spread using this formula
Bid-ask spread=Ask price-Bid price
Let plug in the formula
Bid-ask spread=$31.80-$30.50
Bid-ask spread=$1.30
Now let calculate the Net profit
Using this formula
Net profit=Bid-ask spread*Shares resell
Net profit=$1.3 x 1000 shares
Net profit=$1,300
Therefore the market maker’s net profit from Brent’s transaction will be $1,300
Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: False.
Explanation:
To begin with, the price discrimination strategy refers to a technique used by the companies in order to charge different prices to the different consumers regarding the fact of how much would they be able to pay for the product. When it comes to monopolies, a perfect price discrimination strategy would try as best as possible to capture the majority of the zone known as the <em>"consumer surplus"</em>. And that is why that a company with a perfect price discrimination would face a small deadweight loss area due to the fact that with that strategy of price the monopolist will absorve as much as possible of that area becuase the triangle is half consumer surplus and half producer surplus.
