Expansionary is a macroeconomic policy that seeks to expand the money supply to encourage economic growth or combat inflation (price increases). ... One form of expansionary policy is fiscal policy, which comes in the form of tax cuts, transfer payments, ... Monetary policy: Actions of a central bank or other committees
:333333333333
Based on the coordinates of point x and those of point y on the linear production possibilities curve, the opportunity cost of producing one watch is 2 fewer clocks.
<h3>What is the opportunity cost of producing one watch?</h3>
The opportunity cost of producing one watch is the number of clocks that needs to be given up per watch.
This will therefore be the slope of the linear production possibilities curve which can be found as:
= (Y₂ - Y₁) / (X₂ - X₁)
Solving gives:
= (80 - 20) / (20 - 50)
= 60 / -20
= -2 clocks
This means that for every watch produced, there will be 2 clocks that will be foregone to make that watch.
In conclusion, the opportunity cost is 2 clocks.
Find out more on opportunity cost at brainly.com/question/481029.
#SPJ1
Answer:
<h2>The answer in this case would be option a. or price exceeds marginal cost.</h2>
Explanation:
- Monopolistic competition is a particular type of market structure where multiple or many firms or companies are producing and selling differentiated or heterogeneous products or services.
- A monopolisticially competitive firm maximizes its profit by producing the output level at which the marginal revenue or the additional or incremental revenue obtained from selling one more unit of output is equal to the marginal cost or the additional or incremental cost or expense incurred by the firm or company to produce that one more unit of the output.
- The monopolistically competitive firm charges per unit price of the output which is equal to the demand for any particular product or service in the market and higher than both marginal revenue and marginal cost or above the point where both are equal.Hence,the price charged by the monopolistically competitive firm is higher than both marginal cost and marginal revenue of production.
Answer: For the real business cycle, technical fluctuation that triggers changes in outputs and employment, while for the Keynesian, income and output depend largely on the volume of employment.
Explanation:
The real business cycle theory assumes that when the market undergoes variation in it's ability to turn inputs into product, there is a technical fluctuation that triggers changes in outputs and employment
While the Keynesian, it's sees business cycles as periodic fluctuations of employment, income and their output. This income and output depend largely on the volume of employment.
Answer:
Case summary:
D is a college alum gets trapped in a blizzard on his way home. He was furnished with nourishment and haven by an old couple and he returned home once the climate was clear. D's dad F guaranteed the couple to pay $500 recorded as a hard copy for their assistance and the couple acknowledged. In any case, as D and F had contrasts later, F denied paying that sum.
Case investigation:
Thought: Consideration is the advantage or worth got by the gathering for satisfaction of their guarantee. On the off chance that there is no thought, the agreement isn't enforceable. Following are the components of thought:
-
Lawfully adequate worth: The thought ought to have some an incentive under the lawful arrangements.
-
Dealt trade: The thought ought to give the chance to deal between the gatherings. It implies one gathering should return something of significant worth to the next gathering for execution of that party.
For instance, an individual A guarantees B that he would pay $1,000 for driving him to chip away at that day. Here. An is paying $1,000 for B as an arrival for driving him to work (execution).
A guarantees him to give him a vehicle as he was graduated. It isn't thought since B didn't vow to perform anything. It is only a present for B from A.
Past Consideration: The guarantees which were made by a gathering for the presentation of activities in past by another gathering are unenforceable. As there is no anticipated trade component, it is no thought.
Right now, old couple gave haven to D. They neither guarantee D to give cover nor bartered that he ought to give them something to return.
F guaranteed them to pay $500 as a demonstration of thankfulness for their assistance yet it is a present for their assistance in past. In this way, it isn't past thought.
Consequently, the couple can't hold F at risk for making the installment for giving haven to his child.
