Answer:
E
Explanation:
As the capital asset pricing model dictates, assest's systematic risk is captured by beta parameter. If we have beta value of asset then we can calculate expected return.
- expected return = risk free rate + beta * market risk premium
As both A and B have same beta hence they have same expected returns.
The standard of living will fall down.
The Financial institutions that engage in activities such as investing, currency exchange, and money deposits. Commercial banks, investment banks, brokerage businesses, insurance companies, and asset management funds are common examples.
Americans had faith in the banks and the economy, which appeared to be stable. It would be hard for enterprises to acquire financing if consumers lost trust in the safety of financial institutions . As a result, capital investment would stall, unemployment would rise, output of goods and services would fall, and the overall quality of life would deteriorate.
Therefore, the answer is fall in standard of living.
To know more about financial institution click here:
brainly.com/question/27747219
#SPJ4
Answer: Tenant's improvements that are not legally removable are included in the Personal Property of Others Coverage
Explanation:
The false statement about the Building and Personal Property Coverage Form is that "Tenant's improvements that are not legally removable are included in the Personal Property of Others Coverage"
The above is incorrect. This is because the Tenants Improvements and Betterments are not covered under the
Personal Property of Others Coverage but rather, they are covered in the Business Personal Property.
Answer:
a. Increase
Explanation:
The price earnings ratio is calculated by dividing the market value per share by the earning per share. This means that the price of the share is in the numerator and the earnings per share is in the denominator. If the denominator increases the ratio will decrease and if the numerator increases the ratio will increase. In this case the price of the stock which is the numerator increases from 15 to 18 whereas the earnings which is the denominator remains the same, this means that the price earnings ratio will increase. We can see this example numerically
We know the price of the stock was $15, lets assume the earnings were $1. So before the price change the earnings per share ratio would be 15/1= 15.
When price increases to $18 and earnings remain the same the new price earnings ratio will be 18/1=18. This proves that when earnings are constant and price per share increases the price earning ratio increases.
Answer:
Explanation:
This incident occurred as a result of natural disaster which was beyond the control of the parties involved. Moreover , this incident would have been covered by so many news media and channels which would serve as evidences to buttress their claim.
Therefore , it is easier to make a defense in the fact that the breach occurred due to the natural disaster that was neither forseen nor could be prevented by their effort.