When the Age of Exploration began, there were many reasons European countries wanted to explore. France's motive to explore was similar to that of Spain and England because All the three countries wanted to win as many new converts to their religion as possible.
<h3>What is age of exploration?</h3>
Exploration is the term used to refer to the movement of people to new region to discover what is there, where the age of exploration is a time period where most people are involved in the exploration. the age of exploration is mid 15th and 16th century.
This period is also called the age of discovery. The European countries discovered many routes sea and land that enables trade. this period king John II discovered two routes to Egypt. First by land then the other by other by land.
The exploration is done for several reasons and religion is one of them. Peculiar to this question France, Spain, and England wanted to win as many new converts to their religion as possible.
Read more on age of exploration here: brainly.com/question/2627006
#SPJ!
Answer:
None of the constitution had been created that outlined its authority, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The Directory was a committee of five-member that ruled France in the period between 2nd November 1795 (while it succeeded the Committee of Public Safety) until 9 November 1799, (at the time when Napoleon Bonaparte overthrew it). Napoleon replaced this Directory with the French Consulate. The main reason behind replacing this committee was that none of the constitutions had been drafted that describe its authority.
Answer: Hobbes believed people were naturally selfish and violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Answer:
the rise in power of malcom x
Answer:
I think its B
Explanation:
it has very descriptive words that help you envision what is happening in the scene. Examples: Little icy crystals, pink posies.
