Your cloak is new; even your skin! Idk if that’s right I did this a while ago I don’t remember but there’s my try.
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
No garbage is created after it is used.
Because you can eat the cup after you are done with it, it doesn’t have to be thrown away.
