Answer:
They took store of which family had their portion.
or
They kept track of which families had their portion.
Explanation:
I gave you the first sentence, in case you need to keep the same words. Then, the second is using different words to shorten it. If there are any specific rules for this question, let me know. I can change the sentence up. Hope this helps!
Dangling modifier -- it should be modifying the subject (I) instead it is near the Buildings which are actually the "object" of the verb appeared (though, in truth, appeared doesn't take an object -- B
Trong một diễn biến khác, dân số và lực lượng lao động đã di chuyển
đáng kể từ trang trại đến thành phố, từ đồng ruộng đến nhà máy và trên hết là từ đồng ruộng sang các ngành dịch vụ, do đó cung cấp nhiều dịch vụ cá nhân và công cộng hơn. Trong nền kinh tế ngày nay, những nhà cung cấp dịch vụ này đông hơn nhiều so với những người sản xuất các mục tiêu nông nghiệp và sản xuất.
cre: ggtranslate
Your question is incomplete because you have not provided the underlined pronoun. Thus, the complete sentence is the following:
Nathan told Nadir that <u>his</u> nerves would impact the horse's ability to carry them through the competition.
Answer:
Case: nominative
Reference: ambiguous
Sentence rewritten: After seeing that Nadir was nervous, Nathan told him that nerves would impact the horse's ability to carry them through the competition.
Explanation:
The possessive adjective his functions as nominative case because the noun phrase his nerves functions as the subject of a verb. Besides, it creates ambiguity because it is not clear whose nerves it refers to - Nathan or Nadir's. As a result, it is necessary to rewrite the sentence to clarify whose nerves affect the horse's performance.
