Answer: Reasonable person standard
Explanation:
Reasonable person standard can be defined as one that meets what society expects. This does not mean that the person must be perfect but they behave should be according to the situations that can occuir in the daily life. An example of this would be a person who is driving, when the red signal appears in the traffic light the person knows it has to stop.
The reasonable person has a duty and is to comply with the laws of society. Laws do not vary according to the person, each human being has a responsability to society and must comply with ut. The person must be aware of how its actions affects others, which could positively or negativily. It is important the the citizen kept informed because that will help it to know how to act.
Answer:
The answer is: a comparative study.
Explanation:
A random sample of two populations is being studyied, the population of those who are departing and the population of those who are arriving; in this sense the research methodology is a comparative study that intends to compare the same variable among both populations. The comparison of both will answer the research question.
It's A. That's the best option. ^ω^
Claims might be rejected for a variety of reasons, such as not meeting the claim's requirements or failing to mention the patient's current status.
A letter known as remittance advice is one that a client sends to a supplier to let them know that their invoice has been paid. The remittance advice frequently comes with the customer's check when they pay with a check. A literal letter or a voucher attached to the side or top of the check may serve as guidance. Remittance advice is a letter that customers send to businesses as proof of payment.
Non-compliance with the premium, failure to meet the claim standards, and omission of the patient's current condition are all possible grounds for claim rejection.
To know more about Remittance Advice, refer to this link:
brainly.com/question/24280171
#SPJ4
Answer:
a theory can't be a fact because if it was a fact it would no longer be theory
Explanation: