The article shows how frontline professionals are in a situation of insecurity. This can cause these professionals to be influenced to leave their posts. For this reason, the situation must be treated with rationality and understanding.
<h3>How does the article address the issue of frontline professionals?</h3>
- The article shows that frontline professionals have been overwhelmed during the pandemic.
- The article shows that their workday has been very exhausting.
- The article shows that they have taken risks during the pandemic.
- The article shows that the population has blamed these professionals.
- The article shows that the population has made the population's work difficult.
The situation of frontline professionals has been something very delicate, because, in addition to the exhausting work, the population has not contributed to the comfort of these professionals, insulting and attacking them.
This requires a rational and objective positioning, where the population understands the importance of the work of these professionals and the need to contribute to good service and reduction of cases.
More information about the pandemic at the link:
brainly.com/question/2655465
Answer:
Antonio and Bassanio are close friends who owe each other a great lot of loyalty. They are both well-liked members of the Venetian society. But, it is important to note that their connection is not fully equal.
Answer:Their purpose is to describe the plot, characters, director, etc in order to help determine whether or not a film should be seen. ... Critical reviews may be published many years after a film is released.
Explanation:
Answer:
Private citizens, corporations, and foundations already spend billions of dollars each year to support the arts.
Explanation:
The piece of evidence that best supports this claim is "Private citizens, corporations, and foundations already spend billions of dollars each year to support the arts".
Actually, who are the taxpayers? They are private citizens, corporations and foundations. That means if the government is using taxpayers' money to fund arts, indirectly it means that the billions of dollars spent each year to support arts are the monies of the private citizens, corporations and foundations. This then means that these private citizens, foundations and corporations are actually the ones supporting the arts through the taxes they pay.
