Answer:
The use of sound in both poems is very different in the first hand in the poem mother to son: is composed of free narrative verse, with repetition and consonance, while the poem the village of the blacksmith contains: onomatopoeia rhyming, repetition, alliteration, and meter.
Explanation:
The reasons behind this answer are that in the first place the poem of "Mother to Son" is a poem with a strong focus in the sound of letter "o" as well as in the middle part of the sentence. Focusing on the internal and end rhymes. In the second place the poem of "village blacksmith" is a poem with free verse, meaning that there is not a strict sound or rhythm. With a strong focus on repetition and consonances because the sound of "d" "s" and "n" is very strong in it.
Answer:
syntax and diction that are appropriate to the topic and audience
Explanation:
<em><u>Hey</u></em><em><u>!</u></em><em><u>!</u></em>
<em><u>The</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>name</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>of</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>father</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>of</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Odysseus</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Laertes</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
<em><u>Additional</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>I</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>formation:</u></em>
<em><u>In</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Greek</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>mythology</u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u>Laertes</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>an</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Argonaut</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>hunts</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Calydonion</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Bear.Laertes</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>was</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>son</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>of</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Arcesius</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Chalcomedusa</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>will</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>he</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>helpful</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>to</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u>. </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em>
<h3>
<em><u>(◠‿・)—☆</u></em></h3>
Answer:
Explanation:
He refers to them as savages because he is trying to explain that white men to red man are savages and red man to white men are savages. They are savages to each other because do not understand their ways or traditions. He thinks of white men as savages as they destroy the land because it is their enemy, their animals, etc. and the red man cares for the land as it is theirs so they are savages to each other as they do not understand each other's thinking.