Do the events surrounding the Election of 2000 justify changes to the Electoral College?

2 answers:

5 0

<span>No it did not because the electoral college is necessary as it protects smaller (minority) states from larger (federal) states and it probably is one of the most efficient forms of elections</span>

Aleonysh [2.5K]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The events surrounding the Election of 2000 justify changes to the Electoral College because Bush had won more votes in larger states which shows how successful he was, Gore only got some votes from smaller states. The Electoral College not changing determines the president and other campaign runners to pay close attention to larger areas for votes. Receiving votes from larger states will diminish the votes from smaller states, therefore why the Electoral College can not change. Many people will disagree with these statements as they think, its unfair votes from larger states cancel out votes from smaller states, however it is correct and should not be disagreed upon. The Election of 2000 use a method called, "butterfly ballots" for voting, although this method was stressful, it worked very well.

You might be interested in

Pls help, for brainliest

frozen [14]

Answer:

The two-party system begin to take shape during the early 19th century and what forms did it take is explained below in details.

Explanation:

The primary two-party arrangement consisted of the Federalist Party, which promoted the confirmation of the Constitution, and the Anti-Administration party (Anti-Federalist) or Democratic-Republican Party, which rejected the powerful federal government that the Constitution organized when it took influence in 1789.

7 0

3 years ago

How does the midwives' disobedience affect the Egyptian king?

aksik [14]

I believe D is the answer.

Because Pharaoh doesn't directly punish the midwives nor does he change his mind and continues in killing all the Hebrew baby boys (first born)

Hope it helps you!

3 0

3 years ago

With which army did tecumseh fight

OleMash [197]

They fought the U.S. army

6 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

????????????????????????????????????????????

valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

no. A. lt helped them bring water to their crops

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. How did the Cold War impact national security?

Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

Arms race and Mutually assured destruction

Explanation:

The Americans were paranoid of the Soviets of a possible attack on U.S. soil and the Soviets were scared if the Americans would attack them. Both had a arms race to see who had better tech and weaponry. Both followed a system of Mutually assured destruction where if one attacks another the other will do the same amount of damage.

3 0

4 years ago